Re: insight on S10 ipfilter patch 125014-02?

This is a discussion on Re: insight on S10 ipfilter patch 125014-02? within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; All, I sent some information to Darren off-list over the weekend about this. I did some debugging with patch ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > IPFilter

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2007
Jeff A. Earickson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: insight on S10 ipfilter patch 125014-02?

All,

I sent some information to Darren off-list over the weekend about this.
I did some debugging with patch 125014-02 in place, then backed out the
patch and tried the debugging again. There was no difference, so maybe
I can't blame the patch after all. Now I am reduced to staring at my
ipf.conf, trying more snoop/ipmon debugging, and scratching my head.
All of this happened about the time I applied kernel patch 118833-36
and a myriad of other patches (including 125014-02) onto my system.
I didn't have problems with my test systems, and 118833-36/125014-02
works fine elsewhere. The only way that I can get some of my queued
email to move is to drop ipfilter for a few minutes. Arrrghhhh....

Jeff Earickson
Colby College

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Darren Reed wrote:

> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 02:40:22 -0800
> From: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au>
> To: Jeff A. Earickson <jaearick@colby.edu>
> Cc: ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
> Subject: Re: insight on S10 ipfilter patch 125014-02?
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> How to try and trouble shoot the problem...
>
> You'll need to actually analyse in depth a single connection that fails to
> work. Do you see extra output in the ipmon log files for it?
> Do you see the normal add/remove state messages?
> If you can pick a specific address to trace it from (that isn't otherwise
> used), using dtrace might help...the probes you want are something
> like this:
>
> fbt:ipf:fr_check:entry/((struct ip *)arg0)->ip_src.s_addr == 0xipaddr ||
> (struct ip *)arg0)->ip_dst.s_addr == 0xipaddr/ { self->follow = 1; }
> fbt:ipf:fr-check:return/self->follow/{self->follow = 0;}
> fbt:ipf::entry/self->follow/{}
> fbt:ipf::return/self->follow/{}
>
> Darren
>
> Jeff A. Earickson wrote:
>> Darren,
>>
>> I have been using Sun's shipped version of ipfilter in the
>> past few months with my Solaris 10 systems. Things have worked well
>> with this setup (ipfilter 4.0.3, pfil 2.1.4).
>>
>> In my last patch cycle on Feb 28, Sun patch 125014-02 got
>> applied to my systems (ipfilter 4.1.9, pfil 2.1.6) and now
>> I'm starting to see vague indications of network issues.
>> My biggest headache is with my mail server (a V490 using
>> multipathing, running sendmail). Email is piling up in the
>> outbound queues. If I put in an empty ipfilter ruleset and
>> restart ipfilter, then I can get most of this email to go when
>> I run the queues by hand. If I restart ipfilter with the
>> ruleset that I always had, things start piling up again.
>>
>> I'm also having complaints from students in Australia not
>> being able to connect to our webmail servers, coincident with
>> this patch application to these systems.
>>
>> I haven't opened a Sun case yet, because I don't have much to
>> go on. Got any insight here?
>>
>> Jeff Earickson
>> Colby College

>

Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0