This is a discussion on Re: insight on S10 ipfilter patch 125014-02? within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; All, I sent some information to Darren off-list over the weekend about this. I did some debugging with patch ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
All,
I sent some information to Darren off-list over the weekend about this. I did some debugging with patch 125014-02 in place, then backed out the patch and tried the debugging again. There was no difference, so maybe I can't blame the patch after all. Now I am reduced to staring at my ipf.conf, trying more snoop/ipmon debugging, and scratching my head. All of this happened about the time I applied kernel patch 118833-36 and a myriad of other patches (including 125014-02) onto my system. I didn't have problems with my test systems, and 118833-36/125014-02 works fine elsewhere. The only way that I can get some of my queued email to move is to drop ipfilter for a few minutes. Arrrghhhh.... Jeff Earickson Colby College On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Darren Reed wrote: > Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 02:40:22 -0800 > From: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> > To: Jeff A. Earickson <jaearick@colby.edu> > Cc: ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au > Subject: Re: insight on S10 ipfilter patch 125014-02? > > Hi Jeff, > > How to try and trouble shoot the problem... > > You'll need to actually analyse in depth a single connection that fails to > work. Do you see extra output in the ipmon log files for it? > Do you see the normal add/remove state messages? > If you can pick a specific address to trace it from (that isn't otherwise > used), using dtrace might help...the probes you want are something > like this: > > fbt:ipf:fr_check:entry/((struct ip *)arg0)->ip_src.s_addr == 0xipaddr || > (struct ip *)arg0)->ip_dst.s_addr == 0xipaddr/ { self->follow = 1; } > fbt:ipf:fr-check:return/self->follow/{self->follow = 0;} > fbt:ipf::entry/self->follow/{} > fbt:ipf::return/self->follow/{} > > Darren > > Jeff A. Earickson wrote: >> Darren, >> >> I have been using Sun's shipped version of ipfilter in the >> past few months with my Solaris 10 systems. Things have worked well >> with this setup (ipfilter 4.0.3, pfil 2.1.4). >> >> In my last patch cycle on Feb 28, Sun patch 125014-02 got >> applied to my systems (ipfilter 4.1.9, pfil 2.1.6) and now >> I'm starting to see vague indications of network issues. >> My biggest headache is with my mail server (a V490 using >> multipathing, running sendmail). Email is piling up in the >> outbound queues. If I put in an empty ipfilter ruleset and >> restart ipfilter, then I can get most of this email to go when >> I run the queues by hand. If I restart ipfilter with the >> ruleset that I always had, things start piling up again. >> >> I'm also having complaints from students in Australia not >> being able to connect to our webmail servers, coincident with >> this patch application to these systems. >> >> I haven't opened a Sun case yet, because I don't have much to >> go on. Got any insight here? >> >> Jeff Earickson >> Colby College > |