Re: keep state "issue" / possible feature for the future?
This is a discussion on Re: keep state "issue" / possible feature for the future? within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Boy, I just love responding to a top-posted rats nest. Learn a little netiquette, people. On 2007-03-02 ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
03-02-2007
|
|||
|
|||
Re: keep state "issue" / possible feature for the future?
Boy, I just love responding to a top-posted rats nest. Learn a little
netiquette, people. On 2007-03-02 11:53, chrisj@ucia.gov wrote: > Solaris does indeed use the multiple interfaces > in a seemingly random way (well, it really isn't > random ... I'm sure there is a very logical approach > but to the occasional telnet, ssh, scp, or NFS > application it appears random :-). Is this (or at least the original poster's issue) not something that is controlled via ip_strict_dst_multihoming? -- Jefferson Ogata <Jefferson.Ogata@noaa.gov> NOAA Computer Incident Response Team (N-CIRT) <ncirt@noaa.gov> "Never try to retrieve anything from a bear."--National Park Service 
|
Linear Mode
