This is a discussion on Re: NAT and age within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Christian Karpp wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to understand how aging of NAT entries work. I'm ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Christian Karpp wrote:
> Hi, > > I'd like to understand how aging of NAT entries work. I'm currently > struggling with my NAT table filling up and never expiring any entries. > > I'm using only two rules: > map en0 10.10.0.0/16 -> a.b.c.d/32 age 2 > rdr en0 a.b.c.d port 80 -> 10.10.20.4 port 80 > > One machine on the private net does *a lot* of DNS queries and fills > up the NAT table pretty quickly with entries like: > MAP 10.10.10.3 51019 <- -> a.b.c.d 51019 [e.f.g.h 53] > > No entry ever expires as I can tell from an 'ipnat -s' thus when 30000 > lines have been added, no new connections will be handled. Neither by > the MAP nor by the RDR statement. I have to manually flush the table > ('ipnet -F') first to make things work again. > > I'm using a build of IPFilter v4.1.13, compiled with default options, > running on AIX 5.3TL05 If you do "ipf -V" successively, do you see the value for "fr_ticks" increase? Darren |