RE: Easy port forwarding question

This is a discussion on RE: Easy port forwarding question within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Thanks again, For whatever reason, I simply can't get this to work. I tried your two rdr rules, reloaded ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > IPFilter

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2006
Mann, Bradley
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Easy port forwarding question

Thanks again,

For whatever reason, I simply can't get this to work. I tried your two
rdr rules, reloaded them into ipnat, but I am still unable to connect to
the webserver from my client. For clarity's sake, let me draw a picture
of my setup:


|------------| |------------|
| | | Solaris 10 |
| Client |------------>| ipfilter |
| | | webserver |
|------------| |------------|

There are no machines "behind" my server. All that I am looking to do is
prevent the client from having to type http://serveraddr:8080. I would
like ipfilter (or ipnat) on the server to redirect all requests on port
80 to port 8080, so the client only needs to navigate to
http://serveraddr. Having the webserver listen on another port is not an
option. Can ipfilter accomplish this, and if not, is there anything that
will?

Thanks,

Brad Mann
Software Engineer - Information Access Services
HARRIS Corporation / GCSD
(321) 984-6292

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Bickel [mailto:bickel@idv.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:23 AM
To: Mann, Bradley
Cc: ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
Subject: Re: Easy port forwarding question

Hi Brad

I have a single machine with Solaris 9 4/04 IPFilter 3.4.35
Apache 1.3.xx Tomcat 4.xx running Apache on port 10080 and 10443
and doing the redirect to port 80 and 443. I use two IP addresses
on ce0 so I can run two web sites on the same host, but that makes
no difference to your problem.

here my complete ipnat.conf

#!/sbin/ipnat -f -
#
# THIS EXAMPLE IS WRITTEN FOR IP FILTER 3.4.35
#
# ce0 - network interface, address a.b.c.d/32
#
#
# ftp proxy is needed, so that we can use the ftp client
# even if we don't use NAT
#
> map ce0 0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp

#
# rsh proxy is needed, so that we can SysDREC to outback
# even if we don't use NAT
#
map ce0 0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 514 rcmd/tcp
#
#
#
rdr ce0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 0.0.0.0 port 10080
rdr ce0 0.0.0.0/0 port 443 -> 0.0.0.0 port 10443


here the important parts of my ipf.conf

#
# IPfilter configuration for www.xxxxxxxxx.ch
# IPfilter version: 3.4.35
# Hardware: V440 two CPU Ultrasparc III 1062 MHz 4096 MB Ram
# 4 x 73 GB HD HW Raid 1 + SW Raid 1
# OS: Solaris 9 (HW 4/04)
#
# Maintainer: Peter Bickel IDV & Network Consulting
#
# The following routes should be configured, if not already:
#
# route add a.b.c.42 localhost 0
# route add a.b.c.43 localhost 0
#
block in log quick from any to any with ipopts
block in log quick proto tcp from any to any with short
#
# Receive from internet
#
pass in on ce0 all head 100
# Antispoofing
block in from 127.0.0.0/8 to any group 100
block in from a.b.c.42/32 to any group 100
block in from a.b.c.43/32 to any group 100
#
# allow http https to web server
# Port 80 (http) is redirected to Port 10080 so we filter on 10080
# Port 443 (https) is redirected to Port 10443 so we filter on 10443
#
#
# be part of the World Wide Web
#
pass in quick proto tcp from any to a.b.c.40/29 port = 10080 flags S
keep
state keep frags group 100
pass in quick proto tcp from any to a.b.c.40/29 port = 10443 flags S
keep
state keep frags group 100


here my /etc/rc2.d/S60routing

#!/sbin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 1994 - 2006 by IDV & Network Consulting
# All rights reserved.
#
#ident "@(#)routing 1.7 97/12/08 IDV"

case "$1" in
start)
route add a.b.c.42 localhost 0
route add a.b.c.43 localhost 0
;;

stop)
route delete a.b.c.43 localhost
route delete a.b.c.42 localhost
;;

*)
echo "Usage: $0 { start | stop }"
exit 1
;;
esac
exit 0



this works perfect for me since more than 2 years.

HTH



Mann, Bradley wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Peter,
>
> I tried your configuration but to no avail. I re-read the faq and I'm
> starting to wonder if this will not work for me because of my
> configuration. I have Apache Tomcat running on the same machine where
> ipfilter is running, and there are no machines "behind" it. Normally,

we
> connect directly to a single machine's webserver on port 8080. I am
> trying to make it so that we connect to this machine's webserver

through
> port 80 without moving the listening port of the webserver itself. Is
> this similar to the configuration you are running?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brad Mann
> Software Engineer - Information Access Services
> HARRIS Corporation / GCSD
> (321) 984-6292
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Bickel [mailto:bickel@idv.ch]
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 5:45 PM
> To: Mann, Bradley
> Cc: ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
> Subject: Re: Easy port forwarding question
>
> Hi Brad
>
> I do the following successful on Solaris 9 with IPFilter 3.4.35,
> so I'm able to run apache as non root user.
>
> The following settings in ipnat.conf do the trick.
>
> rdr ce0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 0.0.0.0 port 10080
> rdr ce0 0.0.0.0/0 port 443 -> 0.0.0.0 port 10443
>
> Mann, Bradley wrote:
>> I still haven't found a solution to this seemingly simple problem.

Any
>> ideas on how to redirect port 80 to another port on the same machine
>> using ipnat are greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Brad Mann
>> Software Engineer - Information Access Services
>> HARRIS Corporation / GCSD
>> (321) 984-6292
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
>> [mailto:owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au] On Behalf Of Joseph Spenner
>> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 1:45 PM
>> To: ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
>> Subject: Re: Easy port forwarding question
>>
>> Jim:
>> Was there more to this thread?
>> I'm trying to accomplish something similar but
>> having no luck. Assume there is NO ipf.conf for
>> simplicity.
>> Also, does the machine need to be routing for a port
>> redirect to a port on the same system?
>>
>> My example: I have a tcp server listening on port
>> 19000. I wish to 'copy' that to port to 12321, such
>> that anyone connecting to 12321 will get the same data
>> as if connecting to 19000. tcp/19000 is not bound to
>> any particular interface, so 127.0.0.1:19000 and
>> 10.0.0.6:19000 both are valid.
>>
>> I've tried variations on:
>>
>> rdr eri1 10.0.0.6/32 port 12321 -> 10.0.0.6 port 19000
>> or
>> rdr eri1 0.0.0.0/0 port 12321 -> 10.0.0.6 port 19000
>>
>> I was a bit confused by the example/problem below. It
>> seems the source/destination is backwards, or perhaps
>> my order is backwards? I've tried swapping just in
>> case, but had no luck.
>>
>> Any help would be great.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> --- Jim Sandoz <sandoz@lucent.com> wrote:
>>
>>> brad,
>>> ok, someplace to start -- at the beginning.
>>>
>>> (1)
>>> on the ipf machine, what happens when you
>>> $ telnet 127.0.0.1 8080 ?
>>>
>>> (2)
>>> as root, what is the output of
>>> # ipnat -slv ; ipfstat -v ?
>>>
>>> (3)
>>> as root, type this in your
>>> xterm/console/ssh/whatever session:
>>> # snoop -Vr -d bge0 port 80 or port 8080
>>> now initiate a browser connection from the remote
>>> machine;
>>> record the snoop output for us.
>>>
>>> now repeat step (2).
>>>
>>> jim
>>>
>>>
>>> Mann, Bradley wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the help,
>>>>
>>>> My ipf.conf file is blank. (Comments only)
>>>>
>>>> ipnat.conf has a single line:
>>>> rdr bge0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8080
>>>>
>>>> ifconfig -a outputs the following:
>>>> lo0:

>> flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv 4,VIRTUAL>
>>> mtu
>>>> 8232 index 1
>>>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
>>>> bge0:
>>> flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4>
>>> mtu 1500 index
>>>> 2
>>>> inet 158.147.51.44 netmask ffffff00
>>> broadcast 158.147.51.255
>>>> ether 0:3:ba:f2:e1:a4
>>>>
>>>> Brad Mann
>>>> Software Engineer - Information Access Services
>>>> HARRIS Corporation / GCSD
>>>> (321) 984-6292

>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>

>
>



--

Gruss
Pitsch

__________________________________________________ ______________________
__

Peter Bickel e-mail: bickel@idv.ch
IDV & Network Consulting Telephone: +41 44 853 24 16
Gumpenwiesenstrasse 38 Fax: +41 44 853 27 04
CH-8157 Dielsdorf Mobile: +41 79 666 15 50
Switzerland Web:
http://www.idv.ch/
__________________________________________________ ______________________
__



Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0