Re: Ipfiler on ip.6to4tun0 interfaces? (Solaris)

This is a discussion on Re: Ipfiler on ip.6to4tun0 interfaces? (Solaris) within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; On Wed, 10 May 2006, Darren Reed wrote: > > On Wed, 10 May 2006, Darren Reed wrote: > > &...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > IPFilter

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2006
Peter Eriksson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Ipfiler on ip.6to4tun0 interfaces? (Solaris)

On Wed, 10 May 2006, Darren Reed wrote:

> > On Wed, 10 May 2006, Darren Reed wrote:
> >
> > # ndd -get /dev/pfil qif_status
> > ifname ill q OTHERQ ipmp num sap hl nr nw bad copy copyfail drop notip nodata notdata
> > ip.6to4tun.pfil0 0xf6147324 0xf6329a18 0xf6329a9c 0x0 13 86dd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

> ..
> > # ifconfig ip.6to4tun.pfil0 inet6
> > ip.6to4tun.pfil0: flags=2200041<UP,RUNNING,NONUD,IPv6> mtu 1480 index 8
> > inet tunnel src 81.216.104.103
> > tunnel hop limit 60
> > inet6 fe80::32:0:10/10
> > # ndd -get /dev/pfil qif_status | egrep 6to4tun
> > ip.6to4tun.pfil0 0xf6348dac 0xf6082000 0xf6082084 0x0 13 86dd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> > # ping -ns fe80::32:0:10:1
> > PING fe80::32:0:10:1 (fe80::32:0:10:1): 56 data bytes
> > ^C
> > ----fe80::32:0:10:1 PING Statistics----
> > 6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
> > ip.6to4tun.pfil0 0xf6348dac 0xf6082000 0xf6082084 0x0 13 86dd 52 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> >
> >
> > Ie, "nw" increases for each PING packet I try to send.

>
> That makes sense.
> Are there any counters in "ipfstat" or "netstat -s" output that
> increase in step with the "nw" column?


It's kind of hard to separate normal traffic (running over the normal
ethernets) but I think the following ones atleast seem to be in "sync"
with 6 ping packets I just tried sending:

# diff netstat.before netstat.after
....
< rawipInCksumErrs = 0 rawipOutDatagrams = 377
---
> rawipInCksumErrs = 0 rawipOutDatagrams = 383

....
< icmp6OutMsgs = 1425 icmp6OutErrors = 0
< icmp6OutDestUnreachs= 981 icmp6OutAdminProhibs= 0
---
> icmp6OutMsgs = 1432 icmp6OutErrors = 0
> icmp6OutDestUnreachs= 982 icmp6OutAdminProhibs= 0

....
< icmp6OutPktTooBigs = 0 icmp6OutEchos = 22
---
> icmp6OutPktTooBigs = 0 icmp6OutEchos = 28



I don't see anything directly relevant in the output from "ipfstat"
though:

# diff ipfstat.before ipfstat.after
< IPv6 packets: in 0 out 4641
< input packets: blocked 7038 passed 92817 nomatch 0 counted 0 short 0
< output packets: blocked 215 passed 95243 nomatch 666 counted 0 short 0
---
> IPv6 packets: in 0 out 4643
> input packets: blocked 7038 passed 93459 nomatch 0 counted 0 short 0
> output packets: blocked 215 passed 95794 nomatch 666 counted 0 short 0



Output from ndd:

# diff ndd.before ndd.after|egrep tun
< ip.6to4tun.pfil0 0xf6348dac 0xf6082000 0xf6082084 0x0 13 86dd 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
> ip.6to4tun.pfil0 0xf6348dac 0xf6082000 0xf6082084 0x0 13 86dd 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 4 0 0



> > I also got this kernel warning:
> >
> > May 9 22:23:57 bose tun: tun_wdata_v6: ip.6to4tun0 (inet6) tun: invalid IPv6 src (fe80::32:0:10)

>
> Do you get that if IPFilter/pfil isn't part of the equation?


Dunno... Will check. But I assume it might be due to the fact that the
tunnel isn't "running" so it can't really route the traffic anywhere.
(Wild guess)


--
Peter Eriksson <peter@grebo.net>
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0