Re: Solaris 10+ipfilter how-to (revised)

This is a discussion on Re: Solaris 10+ipfilter how-to (revised) within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Damon Register wrote: > Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:25:31 -0500 > From: ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > IPFilter

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2006
Jeff A. Earickson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Solaris 10+ipfilter how-to (revised)

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Damon Register wrote:

> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:25:31 -0500
> From: Damon Register <damon.register@comcast.net>
> To: ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
> Subject: Re: Solaris 10+ipfilter how-to (revised)
>
> Jeff A. Earickson wrote:
>> Phil,
>>
>> Please find it at:
>>
>> http://www.colby.edu/personal/j/jaea...filter.upgrade
>>
>> Yes, I do periodically update it as I learn new things in the
>> course of working with Solaris 10. Please use this link for the FAQ.

> I have read your procedure but I am still trying to understand it.
> I see that you are describing how to replace the Sun version with a
> different one but I don't understand why one would want do change.
> What is the purpose of replacing the Sun version? Is there something
> wrong with the Sun version? Is it only because people are used to
> the traditional method and would rather use it instead of the new
> Sun approach to services?


The Pros of replacing Sun ipfilter with Darren's latest:
1) You get the latest bug fixes and features of ipfilter.
2) You help humanity by testing the latest version of ipfilter.
3) You get the collected beauty and wisdom of this list.
4) You don't have to hassle with Sun support for ipfilter.

The Cons:
1) Sun support won't help you if you call about ipfilter.
2) You get the latest bugs and mis-features in ipfilter.
3) The list may not be able to help you with your problem.
4) Rolling back to Sun's version may be very hard (I've never
done it).

YMMV. In my case I run version 3.4.31 on my Solaris 9 boxes.
I had problems with later version of 3.x, 3.4.31 works for me,
and I don't have to hassle with pfil.

I run version 4.1.8 on my Solaris 10 boxes with either pfil 2.1.6
or 2.1.7. I have had no luck with 4.1.9 or 4.1.10 in my limited
experience with them. I had a Sun V210 (bge interface) available
for a while to use as a test box with 4.1.9/10. 4.1.9 would hang
the system. With 4.1.10 I got mysterious reboots. Then I had to
put the V210 into production. 4.1.8 is rock solid on my V210 and
V490 systems, so that's what I use with Solaris 10 at this time.

My only test box now is an old Ultra5, and my work-study student
is using it for Jumpstart client testing. I'll return it to
4.1.10 testing when I can.

Jeff Earickson
Colby College
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0