This is a discussion on Re: what am i doing wrong? within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; > > # ipfstat -io > pass out on ipdptp0 proto tcp/udp from 216.41.37.11/32 to any ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
> > # ipfstat -io > pass out on ipdptp0 proto tcp/udp from 216.41.37.11/32 to any keep state > pass out on ipdptp0 proto icmp from 216.41.37.11/32 to any keep state > block in log quick on ipdptp0 proto icmp from any to 216.41.37.11/32 > block in log quick from any to any with ipopt > block in log quick proto tcp from any to any with short > block in on ipdptp0 from any to any > pass in on ipdptp0 proto tcp from 208.218.130.0/27 to 216.41.37.11/32 port = 25 flags S/FSRPAU keep state keep frags > pass in on ipdptp0 proto tcp from any to 216.41.37.11/32 port > 32767 flags S/FSRPAU keep state keep frags head 100 > block in from 0.0.0.0/8 to any group 100 > block in from 10.0.0.0/8 to any group 100 > block in from 127.0.0.0/8 to any group 100 > block in from 169.154.0.0/16 to any group 100 > block in from 172.16.0.0/12 to any group 100 > block in from 192.0.2.0/24 to any group 100 > block in from 192.168.0.0/16 to any group 100 > block in from 216.41.37.11/32 to any group 100 > block in from 224.0.0.0/3 to any group 100 > > http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/ipfil-flow.html From this diagram, it appears that packet filter rules to operate on outbound packets before NAT and inbound packets after NAT. As your firewall is set to default pass, the outbound packets didn't match any of your rules but were passed without maintaining any state information and the inbound packets wouldn't have an existing entry to match. I would add a rule which would pass outbound packets from your internal system to any. When snooping for the traffic on the outside, was the outbound traffic properly NAT'ed? Additionally, the lack of active sessions or host mappings from ipnat -slv seems odd. -Mike |