This is a discussion on Re: Q: reflector/rdr on same interface? within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Nardmann, Heiko wrote: > Hi, > > in the documentation it is stated that I cannot use rdr as a ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Nardmann, Heiko wrote:
> Hi, > > in the documentation it is stated that I cannot use rdr as a reflector, i.e. > if both in and out traffic go through the same interface. Now I wonder how > solve the following situation. > > I have a client application where I configure ip addresses of servers to > contact. Problem is that the customer wants SSL and the application is not > SSL-aware. So I want to use stunnel on the same machine for tunneling. But > how do I now redirect the application requests (to the target ips) to my > local stunnel ports. Based on the routing both application requests and final > stunnel requests go via the same interface. I tried to use logical interfaces > to fool ipf but ipnat does not accept "bge0:1" (btw: Solaris 8/9 is the > environment for this). > > I have thought of configuring loopback (127.x.x.x) addresses inside the > application and redirecting these to the stunnel service ports; this might > work (not yet tested) but is really ugly ... > > Maybe someone has done something similar before ... ? I would redirect to local address on lo0. If ipf lets you get to lo0, I know solaris' loopback is a little odd compared to other operating systems. I do something like this at home for transparent web caching, using ipf 4.x on NetBSD. - Chris |