Solaris 9 kernel panic help, ipfilter version 3.4.32

This is a discussion on Solaris 9 kernel panic help, ipfilter version 3.4.32 within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Greetings, We're having some recurring kernel panics on some Solaris 9 devices that appear to be caused by ipfilter. ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > IPFilter

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2005
Sweeney, William- CIPS
 
Posts: n/a
Default Solaris 9 kernel panic help, ipfilter version 3.4.32

Greetings,
We're having some recurring kernel panics on some Solaris 9 devices that
appear to be caused by ipfilter. Sun support has analyzed the core
dumps and claims the issue is caused by ipf. We're using version
3.4.32, is there a known issue around this, and will moving to a newer
version like 4.1.8 correct this problem?

Here's a core file debug, with some inline comments by the Sun analyst.

------------------ BEGIN DEBUG -------------------
core file: /cores/64649137/64649137vmcore.2
user: Cores User (cores:911)
release: 5.9 (64-bit)
version: Generic_112233-10
machine: sun4u
node name: npls1-dpe01
hw_provider: Sun_Microsystems
system type: SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440
hostid: >>removed<<
time of crash: Mon Jul 4 04:16:37 MDT 2005
age of system: 26 days 9 hours 18 minutes 55.11 seconds
panic CPU: 2 (4 CPUs, 16G memory)
panic string: BAD TRAP: type=31 rp=2a1004a4f70 addr=81a0000100000018
mmu_fsr=0

==== panic kernel thread: 0x2a1004a5d40 pid: 0 on CPU: 2 ====
cmd: sched

t_procp: 0x14382d8(proc_sched) p_as: 0x14381c0(kas)
t_stk: 0x2a1004a5b50 sp: 0x1437511 t_stkbase: 0x2a1004a2000
t_pri: 60(SYS) pctcpu: 0.000000 t_lwp: 0x0
psrset: 0 last CPU: 2
idle: 1 ticks (0.01 seconds)
start: Tue Jun 7 18:58:30 2005
age: 2279887 seconds (26 days 9 hours 18 minutes 7 seconds)
stime: 1906 (26 days 9 hours 18 minutes 36.05 seconds earlier)
()
tstate: TS_ONPROC - thread is being run on a processor
tflg: T_TALLOCSTK - thread structure allocated from stk
T_PANIC - thread initiated a system panic
tpflg: none set
tsched: TS_LOAD - thread is in memory
TS_DONT_SWAP - thread/LWP should not be swapped
TS_SIGNALLED - thread was awakened by cv_signal()
pflag: SSYS - system resident process
SLOAD - in core
SLOCK - process cannot be swapped

pc: 0x104a464 unix:panicsys+0x44: call unix:setjmp
startpc: 0x78053cbc ce:ce_drain_fifo+0x0: save %sp, -0x280, %sp
unix:panicsys+0x44(0x1059310, 0x2a1004a4d28, 0x1437ee0, 0x1, 0x0, 0xd4,
0x8900001600, , , , , , , , 0x1059310, 0x2a1004a4d28)
unix:vpanic+0xcc(0x1059310, 0x2a1004a4d28, 0x1, 0x1, 0x8, 0x8)
unix:panic+0x1c(0x1059310, 0x31, 0x2a1004a4f70, 0x81a0000100000018, 0x0,
0x2000)
unix:die+0xa4(0x31, 0x2a1004a4f70, 0x81a0000100000018, 0x0,
0x300003c2f10, 0x30005b4fb02)
unix:trap+0x874(0x2a1004a4f70, 0x81a0000100000018, , , 0x81a00001, 0x0)
unix:ktl0+0x48()
-- trap data type: 0x31 (data access MMU miss) rp: 0x2a1004a4f70 --
addr: 0x81a0000100000018
pc: 0x13da3a0 ipf:fr_scanlist+0xe0: ldx [%l0 + 0x18], %l0
npc: 0x13da3a4 ipf:fr_scanlist+0xe4: subcc %l0, %g0, %g0 (
cmp%l0, %g0 )
global: %g1 0x4
%g2 0x1 %g3 0x8000
%g4 0x3000444de40 %g5 0x92
%g6 0 %g7 0x2a1004a5d40
out: %o0 0 %o1 0x2a1004a5330
%o2 0x11c5221 %o3 0x11c5221
%o4 0x8 %o5 0x8
%sp 0x2a1004a4811 %o7 0x13daa38
loc: %l0 0x81a0000100000000 %l1 0x300052fdbb8
%l2 0 %l3 0x42c90c85000630a4
%l4 0x30005b4fb24 %l5 0x3c
%l6 0x300082b75a0 %l7 0x1438000
in: %i0 0x202 %i1 0x30005b4fb10
%i2 0x2a1004a5330 %i3 0x30007344d40
%i4 0x3b %i5 0
%fp 0x2a1004a49f1 %i7 0x13db594
<trap>ipf:fr_scanlist+0xe0(0x202, 0x30005b4fb10, 0x2a1004a5330,
0x30007344d40, 0x3b, 0x0)
ipf:fr_check+0x6c4(0x30005b4fb10, 0x14, 0x300052fdbb8, 0x0,
0x2a1004a56a8, 0x2a1004a5810)
ipf:fr_precheck+0xddc(0x2a1004a5810, 0x300052fe2a0, 0x2a1004a56a8, 0x0,
0x0, 0xd4)
ipf:fr_qin+0x3bc(0x300052fe2a0, 0x30007344d40, 0x20, 0x1, 0x30007344d40,
0x30000244000)
unix:putnext+0x21c(0x300052fe528, 0x30007344d40, , 0x1, 0x30005b4fb10,
0xffff)
ce:ce_drain_fifo+0x52e8(0x30005b53288, 0x0)
unix:thread_start+0x4()
-- end of kernel thread's stack --

ipf:fr_scanlist+0xd0: sub %l0, 0x1, %l0 ( dec %l0 )
ipf:fr_scanlist+0xd4: ba,pt %icc, ipf:fr_scanlist+0xb64
(44f)
ipf:fr_scanlist+0xd8: stw %l0, [%fp + 0x7b7]
ipf:fr_scanlist+0xdc: 3: ldx [%fp + 0x7cf], %l0
ipf:fr_scanlist+0xe0: ldx [%l0 + 0x18], %l0 <---HERE is
where we panic

And the reason is that %l0 contains the following:
%l0 0x81a0000100000000

Notice we load it just above off of our frame pointer
0x2a1004a49f1 = 0
SolarisCAT(64649137vmcore.2)> rd 0x2a1004a49f1+0x7cf
0x2a1004a51c0 = 0x81a0000100000000
SolarisCAT(64649137vmcore.2)>

I've seen this panic before, it's an issue with "ipf" which is not our
product (only in Solaris 10 is it something we support).

SolarisCAT(64649137vmcore.2)> modinfo -p ipf
id flags modctl textaddr size cnt name
108 LIN 0x30005cfeca0 0x13d5ffe 0x29d59 1 ipf (IP Filter:
v3.4.32)
SolarisCAT(64649137vmcore.2)>
------------------ END DEBUG -------------------

Thanks for any advice or pointers to known issues!
Bill Sweeney

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those
who have not got it."
- George Bernard Shaw

Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0