RE: Virtual Interfaces

Hello

In my opinion it makes no sense to do that at all. In any case virtual
IP traffic goes via real interface hme0 (for example), so all rules can
be bind to this physical interface. What do you expect from supporting
virtual interfaces ? Maybe I missed something ?



With best regards
Martynas

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
[mailto:owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au] On Behalf Of Doug Norton
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 4:53 PM
To: Brian.Olmsted@allstream.com; ipfilter@cairo.anu.edu.au
Subject: RE: Virtual Interfaces

Yep that's what I was referring too.
Any idea if ipfilter will support virtual interfaces in the future?



>From: "Olmsted, Brian" <Brian.Olmsted@allstream.com>
>To: "Doug Norton" <norton987@hotmail.com>, <ipfilter@cairo.anu.edu.au>
>Subject: RE: Virtual Interfaces
>Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:38:37 -0400
>
>If you mean interfaces like hme0:1, hme0:2, etc... no but you can use
>the real interface hme0 and put the rules specific to the IP addresses
>assigned to hme0:1, hme0:2, etc.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
>[mailto:owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au] On Behalf Of Doug Norton
>Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 10:29 AM
>To: ipfilter@cairo.anu.edu.au
>Subject: Virtual Interfaces
>
>Does anyone know if ipfilter supports virtual interfaces?
>If so what version and is their any documentation on it.
>
>Thanks,
>Doug
>
>
>