This is a discussion on Re: IPFilter and IPv6 within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Darren Reed wrote: > For those that use IPFilter with IPv6, does the current > configuration cause any problems for ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Darren Reed wrote:
> For those that use IPFilter with IPv6, does the current > configuration cause any problems for you? No major ones in ipfilter, but some in ipnat. > Do you edit ipf.conf and forget to edit ipf6.conf or vice verssa? > > Are there interaction issues or reporting problems needing to > remember -6? Nope. That's fine with me. > If there was just a single configuration file, ipf.conf, that > contained all IP (IPv4/6) firewall rules, would this make like > easier or harder? Maybe harder, but not much. It's just a fuzzier separation that way. I could deal either way, but I like the separation that two config files allows. > If you were forced to manually transition your current system > layout with both ipf.conf and ipf6.conf, would this be a serious > issue? Nope. Could be done. > One other question, if NAT were to support IPv6 also, would you > expect a ipnat6.conf or for it to all fit in ipnat.conf? I would expect and want it to mirror the other. So, right now, I'd want an ipnat6.conf. But, I think having just one makes sense too. I just think consistency is most valueable. So, other than the aforementioned problem I'm having with ipnat messing with ports on IPv6 packets, I'm good. And that's a NetBSD 2.x problem, I think, so. - Chris |