This is a discussion on Re: Getting ipfilter to work on Solaris 10 within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; I have a x86 Solaris 10 box up and running, but not using sppp. The maintenance to put this box ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I have a x86 Solaris 10 box up and running, but not using sppp. The maintenance to put this box live is not until the 22nd, so if I can help with tracking something down I can do so. I did not have any immediate issues with IPFilter, the Solaris 10 installer program has a couple of minor things that could do with some attention maybe. (1 annoyance, and 1 cosmetic). That and that there appears to be no IPFilter header files shipped with the OS. Lund Darren Reed wrote: >>On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 14:37 +1100, Darren Reed wrote: >>For now I give up. Solaris' own ipfilter is clearly not working and >>using a self compiled ipfilter causes system crashes. > > > I'll clarify the situation here. > > IPFilter with sppp does not work in Solaris10 "out of the box". This > may be a bigger problem than first anticipated given that ADSL & pppoe > is the way a lot of people connect to the Internet, today. I'll see > what I can do about changing this situation but I cannot promise anyone > anything. > > Being able to fix a problem is, in general, directly proportional to > the amount of information available to describe it. For example, if > someone just says "I tried this and it panics", I don't know where to > start for testing/replicating the problem. If I've got access to the > crash dumps, I can dig, in depth, through information about what was > happening. On the other hand, sending html (only) email doesn't work > for me either (I read email using a command line program, not a web > browser.) > > >>I was quite determined to run Solaris but this and other issues are >>very frustrating. > > > I can understand. > > >>For over a week now I try to get it working properly with >>only very limited success. > > > I'm sorry it wasn't a better experience for you. > > >>Given the fact that a lot of Sun people treat >>Linux like a child implying Solaris' technical superiority I expected >>more from this OS. > > > Sometimes that "superiority" will lead to decisions being made not to > support features that users desire, as is the case here, because the > technical solution does not meet with internal requirements at Sun. > In the Linux world, people can do anything and the bar is much much > lower. > > And amongst all this, the frustrating part for me is I'm not able (yet) > to do anything to test all this for various reasons, including lack of > equipment at home & at work (I'm living & working away from my normal > place of residence for most of this year.) Even then, I'm not sure how > to go about building up a PPPoE test rig that includes a server end of > some kind so I could try test out what you're trying to do. > > Darren > > -- Jorgen Lundman | <lundman@lundman.net> Unix Administrator | +81 (0)3 -5456-2687 ext 1017 (work) Shibuya-ku, Tokyo | +81 (0)90-5578-8500 (cell) Japan | +81 (0)3 -3375-1767 (home) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|