This is a discussion on Re: ipfilter and Solaris 10 within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; In some email I received from Need Coffee, sie wrote: > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:24:32 +0100, ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
In some email I received from Need Coffee, sie wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:24:32 +0100, casper.dik@sun.com > <casper.dik@sun.com> wrote: > > > > It's part of the standard Solaris release; the version number reported > > is not really proper so it's changed in the next express release to: > > > > ipf: IP Filter: v4.0.2 (592) > > > > We've made a number of changes to ipfilter such that it is > > now well-behaved; this gives some divergence and just removing > > and pkgadding the "standard version" will give you some grief; > > and also no integration with SMF. > > > > As it is part of the OS it will be supported. > > Not to be rude, but does "well-behaved" mean that it will work with > IPsec without causing panics? Whenever I've tested IPFilter with IPsec, I've not seen any evidence of panics. If you know of reliably reproducible scenarios that do cause a panic, I'd be most interested in hearing from you and attempting to reproduce and fix them. Darren |