This is a discussion on Re: Feature request & patch within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Hello List, well, 6 days have passed since I sent my original post and there isn't any response yet. ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hello List,
well, 6 days have passed since I sent my original post and there isn't any response yet. Not very surprisingly but anyway I would like to know two things: 1. What do others think about the usefulness of such a feature? 2. What are the chances for this to be included into the next (or one of the subsequent) release? Best regards, Andrei Friday, July 4, 2003, 1:55:58 PM, Andrei Syrovenko wrote: > Hello List, hello Darren. > It would be perfect to be able to "pin" a label to a rule so that > there will be a simple but efficient way to distinguish between rules > or a group of rules. These labels should not be unique. Then, for > example, I will be able to look through a list of rules and sum up all > the statistic counters associated with rules with the same label > before storing them to database. > I made some changes to IPFilter to allow users to pin a label to > rules. The syntax will be as follows: > count in on ed0 from 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.201 port = 3128 label 1 > count out on ed1 from 192.168.1.1 to any label 1 > count out on ed0 from 192.168.1.201 port = 3128 to 192.168.1.1 label 10001 > count in on ed1 from any to 192.168.1.1 label 10001 > You can find patches for IPFilter 3.4.31 and 3.4.32 in attached files. > Could someone who is familiar enough with IPFilter source (Darren?) > review them as there might be some additional changes required due to > the change made to 'ip_fil.h'. > Regards, > Andrei. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|