This is a discussion on Re: content matching on tcp connections... within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; sorry, wrong mailing list .... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens" <s.sonnenberg@coolspot.de> To: "...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
sorry, wrong mailing list ....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens" <s.sonnenberg@coolspot.de> To: "Craig Paterson" <craigp@tippett.com>; "Darren Reed" <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> Cc: <ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:22 PM Subject: Re: content matching on tcp connections... > http://licensekey.realnetworks.com/r...dex.html?ulf=b > You can download a 12 Month period linux version (x86). > Should work with linux-compat. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Craig Paterson" <craigp@tippett.com> > To: "Darren Reed" <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> > Cc: <ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au> > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:08 PM > Subject: Re: content matching on tcp connections... > > > > On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 08:42, Darren Reed wrote: > > > > > Long ago (well almost 3 years now), I put some code into IPFilter > > > 3.5alpha (became 4.0alpha) that does this: > > > > > > > # Scan for anything that looks like HTTP and redirect it to the local > > > > # proxy. One catch - this feature (redirect) is not yet implemented. > > ... > > > > > > With the above, there are no port numbers mentioned because the > connection > > > content scanning (I think limited to first 16 bytes or thereabouts) is > done > > > across _all_ TCP connections that go through IPFilter's state table. > > > > > > This kind of thing could be used to block out kazaa - completely. > > > > > > I think I ditched it because I didn't think it would be that useful. > > > > > > Should I dust this off and let it back in ? > > > > I'd like to experiment with it, for one. Controlling outbound traffic is > > a big issue for us, and anything that could break mainstream P2P apps > > would be useful. > > > > Thanks, > > Craig. > > > > > > > > > > |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|