This is a discussion on Re: content matching on tcp connections... within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; http://licensekey.realnetworks.com/r...dex.html?ulf=b You can download a 12 Month period linux version (x86). Should ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
http://licensekey.realnetworks.com/r...dex.html?ulf=b
You can download a 12 Month period linux version (x86). Should work with linux-compat. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Paterson" <craigp@tippett.com> To: "Darren Reed" <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> Cc: <ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:08 PM Subject: Re: content matching on tcp connections... > On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 08:42, Darren Reed wrote: > > > Long ago (well almost 3 years now), I put some code into IPFilter > > 3.5alpha (became 4.0alpha) that does this: > > > > > # Scan for anything that looks like HTTP and redirect it to the local > > > # proxy. One catch - this feature (redirect) is not yet implemented. > ... > > > > With the above, there are no port numbers mentioned because the connection > > content scanning (I think limited to first 16 bytes or thereabouts) is done > > across _all_ TCP connections that go through IPFilter's state table. > > > > This kind of thing could be used to block out kazaa - completely. > > > > I think I ditched it because I didn't think it would be that useful. > > > > Should I dust this off and let it back in ? > > I'd like to experiment with it, for one. Controlling outbound traffic is > a big issue for us, and anything that could break mainstream P2P apps > would be useful. > > Thanks, > Craig. > > > |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|