Re: [courier-users] breaking smtp, smart host spam

This is a discussion on Re: [courier-users] breaking smtp, smart host spam within the Courier-Imap forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Gordan Bobic wrote: > Not any more. The number of spamming zombies that spam ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Mail Servers and Related > Courier-Imap

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-04-2007
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [courier-users] breaking smtp, smart host spam

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Gordan Bobic wrote:
> Not any more. The number of spamming zombies that spam via the smart
> host is on the increase - and if the zombie is smart enough to use the
> smart host, it's safe to assume that it's also smart enough to use the
> authentication.


Oh, that's why you have TLS, or non-cleartext-based authentication methods. But if you have an
intelligent enough software that owned one of your client computers that can steal / hijack
authenticated sessions, then you have another problem, too: infection :P

> If malware knows how to read your mail reader config and retrieve the
> smart host, and then forges the envelope to the same domain as your
> email address, that in one fell swoop kills all RFC compliance based
> filtering (nolisting, unlisting, greylisting) and IP based blacklisting.


Sure. That's why there are system administrators that have to proactively and reactively check their
networks :) - That's called working. There is no foolproof methodology. Regarding SPAM, we are
trying to protect about INCOMING email INTO our network, not OUTGOING email OUT of our network. This
last thing is called ABUSE, which has nothing to do with standard anti-spam procedures.

> Then we'll be stuck with content-based filtering alone again, which is a
> bit too questionable a method for my liking at the moment.


I don't like content-scanning either, and don't run it. SPF, Greylisting and DNSBL is more than
enough. Thunderbird takes care of statistical spam flagging (on the client, of course).

> I'd start looking now if I were you. This has been coming for a while.


I agree.

- --
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica
Servicios Ofrecidos: http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/
Unase a los Foros GNU/Buanzo - La palabra Comunidad en su maxima expresion.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHLcf4AlpOsGhXcE0RCjm2AJ46x8yKwhVBcaSdBTMa1E hx6qPo1QCfXgxW
FGle880xdxjG9jWOsEfL2hk=
=Sh+U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0