Re: [courier-users] breaking smtp, smart host spam

This is a discussion on Re: [courier-users] breaking smtp, smart host spam within the Courier-Imap forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; J=E9r=F4me Blion wrote: >> Personally, I think transparency is a negative in this situation, since = >> ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Mail Servers and Related > Courier-Imap

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-04-2007
Gordan Bobic
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [courier-users] breaking smtp, smart host spam

J=E9r=F4me Blion wrote:

>> Personally, I think transparency is a negative in this situation, since =


>> valid users of your network have nothing to indicate that they can't =


>> reach the mail servers that they are supposed to use, or why that would =


>> be the case.

> =


> When allowing all computers to send mails directly, when a virus is =


> spreading on the network, I wouldn't imagine the load of the entire syste=

m.
> Viruses don't try to use the mail user agent and so, the configuration =


> of it is not retrieved yet... They directly send mails.


Not any more. The number of spamming zombies that spam via the smart =

host is on the increase - and if the zombie is smart enough to use the =

smart host, it's safe to assume that it's also smart enough to use the =

authentication. It's going to be the next big pain in the backside to =

deal with. Most of the existing anti-spam methods will be ineffective =

about it.

If malware knows how to read your mail reader config and retrieve the =

smart host, and then forges the envelope to the same domain as your =

email address, that in one fell swoop kills all RFC compliance based =

filtering (nolisting, unlisting, greylisting) and IP based blacklisting. =

It won't outright break whitelisting, but the only servers/networks that =

remain whitelisted are likely to be the ones that stamp out the malware =

before it gets out into the wild (e.g. through use of transparent proxy =

filters).

Then we'll be stuck with content-based filtering alone again, which is a =

bit too questionable a method for my liking at the moment.

> So, for now, a simple firewall is needed. All mailservers can be =


> configured to be smarthosts. All clients should use a valid SMTP server =


> (through VPN or not)
> =


> To catch all zombies, just configure your firewall to log what you need. =


> A batch could process logs and give you all your need to clean your netwo=

rk.
> =


> When zombies computers will behave like normal computers, we will look =


> for another ways to block them.


I'd start looking now if I were you. This has been coming for a while.

Gordan

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0