Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

Re: [courier-users] NFS server load thru the roof

This is a discussion on Re: [courier-users] NFS server load thru the roof within the Courier-Imap forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; email builder wrote: > > > We have not tried non-reiserfs over NFS, although we have before we moved ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Mail Servers and Related > Courier-Imap

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2005
Gordon Messmer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [courier-users] NFS server load thru the roof

email builder wrote:
>
>
> We have not tried non-reiserfs over NFS, although we have before we moved it
> to NFS and we did not have this issue. We tried the noatime option briefly
> and the iowait spiked right back up after remounting.


I've never used ReiserFS on an NFS server, so I'm not sure if there are
issues or not. I think I recall that it took a long time for the kernel
developers to get NFS working at all on Reiser.

>>>> Briefly, mail spool is mounted over NFS, everything runs smoothly until
>>>>we
>>>>turn IMAP on and server load goes off the scale (NFS client load 300, NFS
>>>>server load 10, with server in wait about 80% of the time).

>>
>>How many users are connecting to the NFS client host at the same time?
>>If you run 'ps ax' on that host, you should see ~300 processes in R or D
>>state. What are they?

>
> Lots of nfs processes is ps, but that's cuz we run 128 of them. 16 in state
> D, 115 in state S, none in state R. (looks like the total doesn't match up
> but you get the idea) Is this abnormal. Our stats on the mail server show
> at this time that there are 20-25 concurrent users using IMAP.


I think you're talking about the NFS server host. I was asking about
the client. If the load is 300, then there should be ~300 processes in
R or D state.

>>>>I am guessing it is more of a NFS
>>>>configuration thing, or possibly something with our file system on the

>>NFS
>>>>server (reiserfs and RAID 5), but I'm a little wet-behind-the-ears on

>>that
>>>>front, so even some baby hand-holding by someone who has the time and
>>>>patience would be highly appreciated. I mean, I don't even know if the
>>>>"sync" option for our mail spool NFS mount is best turned off....?

>>
>>"sync" is off by default, and should remain so.

>
> I read some more on this. sync is only off by default on the client, but is
> on by default on the server.


Oh, you meant NFS. I thought you were talking about the mount option
for ReiserFS. "sync" is default for NFS, and that should probably be
left alone, too.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0