This is a discussion on RE: [courier-users] What to use? ldap or MySQL within the Courier-Imap forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; courier-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: > From: Dan Johansson [mailto:Dan.Johansson@bluewin.ch] >>=20 >&...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
courier-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> From: Dan Johansson [mailto:Dan.Johansson@bluewin.ch] >>=20 >> I'm about to setup a Courier mailsystem for a small Company (~50 >> accounts). I want to use virtual mail accounts on this system. I was >> thinking about either a ldap or MySQL backend for authentication. So >> my question is: Which backend to use, ldap or MySQL? I would >> appreciate some advice/suggestions/"horror stories"/"success >> stories"/pro/cons of the two methods. >=20 > For only 50 accounts, I would bypass both and use the > built-in userdb. I am using it with ~1000 accounts (~300 > active) with no problems. >=20 I have to differ with the recommendation. I would use MySQL with Quica = or something like it. It makes managing the accounts much easier. = Especially with such a small installation, the less of your time you spend managing = the server, the better. I have also used UserDB for accounts, for about 200 accounts. It wasn't = too bad, as I scripted most of it. But MySQL is no harder to set up, so why not? And then add a nice web GUI front-end for account maintenance, and = now it's so easy, our HR person adds most of the accounts when she is = getting their paperwork filled out on their first day on the job. Not that = she's not smart, it's just that having a non-techie set up email makes my job = much easier. > Userdb has the advantage of being extremely easy to configure > and manage. If you grow to thousands of accounts, you might > see performance problems, but then you could migrate to ldap or MySQL. >=20 Agreed, but I lost a bit when I did the migration to MySQL. If you're starting off, you might as well start off right. > I have a server I am currently testing that is using ldap. > It works very well, but if you are not familiar with ldap, > there is a VERY steep learning curve. The advantage is that > it is fast (if you index it correctly), scaleable (I've > tested with over 200,000 accounts), and it can be used for > authentication with other services as well. I think that's the key to LDAP. If you use it for other stuff, then use = it. If it's only for Courier, it's overkill, IMHO. >=20 > Bowie ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users |