Re: [courier-users] Re: MAXRCPT per domain

Trev wrote:

>Rodrigo Severo <rodrigo.lists@fabricadeideias.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>A client (Courier in this case) SHOULD treat a 552 error after a RCPT TO
>>command as 452. But the text says SHOULD and not MUST.
>>
>>
>
>I think it would be desirable for Courier to implement the RFC's
>suggestion, and treat a RCPT TO response of 552 as a synonym for 452.
>It would be very helpful in some situations (such as the one you are
>experiencing now) and I don't think it would ever be harmful.
>
>
I definitely agree with you.

>Possibly you could patch it yourself? I haven't looked at the code to
>know whether this would be easy.
>
I haven't looked at this part of the code for a long time but I don't
think it would be difficult.

The real problem here is that I don't think Sam would accept this patch
so it would be a short lived effort.


Regards,

Rodrigo Severo



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users