Re: [courier-users] Problem compiling AuthLib .57 on Solaris10 (Modified

This is a discussion on Re: [courier-users] Problem compiling AuthLib .57 on Solaris10 (Modified within the Courier-Imap forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; On Solaris (Sparc) I got courier to compile by using: WHOLEARCHIVE='-Wl,-z -Wl,allextract' NOWHOLEARCHIVE='-Wl,-z -Wl,defaultextract' ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Mail Servers and Related > Courier-Imap

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2005
Ricky Chan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [courier-users] Problem compiling AuthLib .57 on Solaris10 (Modified

On Solaris (Sparc) I got courier to compile by using:

WHOLEARCHIVE='-Wl,-z -Wl,allextract' NOWHOLEARCHIVE='-Wl,-z
-Wl,defaultextract' CFLAGS="-DSOLARIS -g -O2" ./configure (followed by
your configuration options).

This is using Solaris ld. Funny thing is we migrated off SPARC a few
weeks later... ;)

Ricky

Ricardo Meleschi wrote:

> (I tried to reply directly to mark, but my e-mails keep on bouncing
> back marked as spam)
>
>
> Thanks for the reply Mark..
>
> 1) SPARC
>
> 2) A ./configure with no options.
>
> 3) LD is in /usr/local/bin because I downloaded binutils and compiled
> them with the Solaris GCC in an attempt to have the latest version on
> the system. The Solaris provided gnu version of ld produced the exact
> same error. It's located in dir /usr/sfw/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin on
> a standard Solaris10 instalation.
>
> 4) I have compiled many other source packages from the internet,
> including BerkeleyDB, binutils, expect, libtool, tcl, and tk. None of
> them had a problem like what is showing up now..
>
> Can you think of anything else I should check?
>
> Ricardo Meleschi
>
> On Aug 5, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>> ricardo meleschi wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone had any thoughts on this yet? I've done some more
>>> troubleshooting, but nothing has worked so I'm basically stuck...
>>> =( Should I try downloading and compiling the entire Courier set,
>>> as opposed to compiling everything independantly? Does anyone think
>>> that'll help

>>
>>
>> A few guesses and questions:
>>
>> (1) Is the Solaris 10 system SPARC based or x86?
>> (2) What 'configure' line did you use to generate the Makefile?
>> (3) Why is your loader ('ld') in /usr/local/bin? I don't have access
>> to my old installation of Solaris 10 x86, but it surprises me that
>> Sun would install their loader in /usr/local/bin. Was gcc (and ld)
>> bundled with Solaris 10 or did you install them yourself?
>> (4) If you download another source package from the internet, for
>> example, courier maildrop, does it compile and link properly?

>





-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0