Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

Re: [courier-users] Re: Automatically use secondary MX host if primary

This is a discussion on Re: [courier-users] Re: Automatically use secondary MX host if primary within the Courier-Imap forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; Ben Kennedy wrote: >Rodrigo Severo wrote at 7:12 pm (-0300) on 20 6 2005: > > > >&...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Mail Servers and Related > Courier-Imap

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005
Rodrigo Severo
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [courier-users] Re: Automatically use secondary MX host if primary

Ben Kennedy wrote:

>Rodrigo Severo wrote at 7:12 pm (-0300) on 20 6 2005:
>
>
>
>>>Why should Courier contact a secondary MX if it was perfectly able to
>>>reach the primary?
>>>
>>>

>>Two possible reasons that came to my mind right now are: a 4xx error and
>>a "Connection time out" => "deferred" situation.
>>
>>

>
>There is a fault in your logic here. If there is a "connection time
>out", then clearly it was not "perfectly able to reach the primary".
>Therefore, in this case, the secondary MX would be tested (presumably).
>
>

I agree that in such a situation the secondary MX should be tested. I
see that you believe Courier does it but I'm afraid Courier doesn't in
this specific situation.

Could you clarify this issue Sam?

>
>
>>You couldn't be more right. My problem is that I have, by contract, to
>>send several emails to this client and my messages aren't getting
>>through because of the problems on their MX.
>>
>>

>
>So set up esmtproutes. If the first MX is unreliable, hard-code the
>second MX instead.
>
>

If one of the servers is always busy and the other always free this
would be a good enough solution. The problem is that sometimes both
servers change wholes.

>
>
>>As I said, I believe that trying subsequent MXs on 4xx errors and
>>"Connection time out" would be more constructive. I can't see a problem
>>here. Do you?
>>
>>

>
>What is this "connection time out" you keep alluding to;
>

The "connection time out" I keep alluding to is the error Courier logs
when it contacts another server trying to send a message and during the
smtp conversation Courier's timeout is exceded waiting for some answer.

>are we talking
>about the same thing?
>
>

I think so but I'm not sure. What do you think?


Rodrigo Severo





-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0