Re: [courier-users] Re: Automatically use secondary MX host if primary

Ben Kennedy wrote:

>Maybe on a 4xx it would make sense. I can't see how it would with a 5x=
x,
>though. If you have 2 MXs and they don't agree on who is a valid user
>(for example), you have bigger problems.
>
>
My fault. You are right. There is no good reason to try a second MX if I=

get a 5xx error.

There still remains the 4xx error situation and the "Connection timed
out" =3D> "deferred" situation. Why not try a second MX in these situati=
ons?

>If it's "turned off", then Courier would try and fail and move on to th=
e
>next one, as it currently does, so what's the difference?
>
Yes you are right again. I mentioned this because I had this problem
with a very old Courier version I was running some time ago. Old problem=

already solved.

But again ther still remains the server too busy situation where I end
getting a "Connection time out". Wouldn't it be good to try a second MX
here?


Rodrigo Severo




-------------------------------------------------------------

Internet security is just like sex, everybody says: "I'm doing it."

-------------------------------------------------------------

Rodrigo Severo
F=E1brica de Id=E9ias
rodrigo@fabricadeideias.com
SBS - Ed. Empire Center - Sala 1301 - Cobertura
CEP: 70070-904
Fone: (61) 321 1357
Fax: (61) 223 1712

-------------------------------------------------------------



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users