This is a discussion on [courier-users] Re: make check fails - using nfs within the Courier-Imap forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; --- Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl> wrote: > email builder wrote: > > >Martijn & others, > > &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
--- Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl> wrote: > email builder wrote: > > >Martijn & others, > > > > I am seeing this make check failure when my mail spool is on nfs. Not > sure > >what to do with this or if this test is even that important. FC3, no > options > >except enabled unicode. > > > >INFO: LOGIN, user=confmdtest, ip=[127.0.0.1], protocol=SMAP1 > >INFO: LOGOUT, user=confmdtest, ip=[127.0.0.1], headers=0, body=0, time=2 > >INFO: LOGIN, user=confmdtest, ip=[127.0.0.1], protocol=SMAP1 > >INFO: LOGOUT, user=confmdtest, ip=[127.0.0.1], headers=0, body=0, time=5 > >make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 1 > >make[2]: Leaving directory > >`/home/admin/courier-imap/courier-imap-4.0.3.20050618/imap' > >make[1]: *** [check] Error 2 > >make[1]: Leaving directory > >`/home/admin/courier-imap/courier-imap-4.0.3.20050618/imap' > >make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 > > > > > > I don't remember if this was the exact same error, but it sounds pretty > similar. > > > Martijn mentioned he had this problem but didn't mention what he did > except > >"repeat on local filesystem".... how do I do that? I *want* my mailspool > on > >nfs, but I can test it locally, but don't know where to tell make check to > >look somewhere else...? > > > > > > It's only the check that is failing. Courier will work fine over NFS. > Just repeat the make on a local filesystem. The make does NOT use your > real mailspool, IIRC it just creates a subdirectory in your current > directory. Ah, DUH. OK, it's NOT my mailspool (which did seem a bit strange, since I am only building the software, not installing it yet), it's that I am doing the build itself of the software over NFS. Thanks! > Know what you do when you run a mailspool over nfs (all usual caveats of > nfs apply, f.i. what happens really when your nfs server goes down?), > but it is perfectly allright. I deliver mail to a mailspool over NFS, > and read it locally. That is just coincidence, I had it set up the other > way around before that, but changed it as the current setup has better > performance for me (the machine where the mailspool now resides is > twenty times faster than the other). Now if I could create a mailspool > on a NetApp.... Actually I know an ISP that does and I hear they use > courier as well. We're pushing and pulling all our mail over NFS so we can keep our options open in terms of how/where we put our data (might move to GFS in future), as well as allowing ourselves to create more redundancy for SMTP/IMAP server, etc. Thanks a lot! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users |