RE: [courier-users] how to configure SPF records?

This is a discussion on RE: [courier-users] how to configure SPF records? within the Courier-Imap forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; Ricardo Kleemann wrote: > I've never configured SPF, I don't even know if my version of courier > ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Mail Servers and Related > Courier-Imap

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2005
Julian Mehnle
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: [courier-users] how to configure SPF records?

Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
> I've never configured SPF, I don't even know if my version of courier
> supports SPF (I'm using 0.44.2)


No, it doesn't. The first version of Courier that supported SPF
_checking_ was 0.47.0.

However, that doesn't matter in this case, because it was another server,
not yours, that performed an SPF check. Be aware that the concept of SPF
is comprised of two parts: (1) publishing SPF DNS records for sender
domains, and (2) receiver-side checking of messages against published SPF
records.

(Publishing SPF records happens in the domain name system, and has nothing
to do with the website at http://spf.pobox.com.)

> A client is having some trouble when using authenticated smtp. The
> server on the other end is complaining about SPF records, I get this
> bounce:
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> <chico02@joimail.com>
> (reason: 550 SPF NONE, if sender valid send to
> allow-uqwz-64.80.255.252@joimail.com more info see
> http://mail.joimail.com/allow.htm)


This error message is too little information for anyone to completely
analyze the problem you are experiencing.

The one thing I can read from your report is that the MX of joimail.com
checked the message relayed through your server for SPF compliance, and
then rejected the message, probably because the message's MAIL FROM
(envelope sender) domain did not have an SPF record.

It is highly unusual for receivers to _require_ sender domains to have an
SPF record. In the long run, if/when SPF has become ubiquitous, this will
be a useful practice, but at this time, you just can't expect all domains
to have SPF records. So you should tell postmaster@joimail.com not to
reject messages on an SPF result of "NONE".

But it would of course be wise for the sender's domain to publish an SPF
record anyway. Unfortunately, one can't tell which domain that is without
seeing the original message -- was it attached to the bounce?



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0