[courier-users] Re: Double-checking install scenario.

Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@courier-mta.com> writes:

> Lloyd Zusman writes:
>
>> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
>> /var/tmp/courier-0.49.0.20050405-1.9-buildroot
>> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>> /usr/lib/courier/share/courierwebadmin/admin-34fax.html
>> /usr/lib/courier/share/courierwebadmin/admin-34fax.pl
>> /usr/lib/courier/share/courierwebadmin/admin-35fax.html
>> /usr/lib/courier/share/courierwebadmin/admin-35fax.pl
>> RPM build errors:
>> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>> /usr/lib/courier/share/courierwebadmin/admin-34fax.html
>> /usr/lib/courier/share/courierwebadmin/admin-34fax.pl
>> /usr/lib/courier/share/courierwebadmin/admin-35fax.html
>> /usr/lib/courier/share/courierwebadmin/admin-35fax.pl
>> In step 1, I did an "rpmbuild -ta AUTHLIB-TARBALL". I did this
>> as user "courier".
>> In step 2, I went to ~/rpm/RPMS/i386 and did an rpm install of the rpms
>> that step 1 built for courier-authlib, courier-authlib-devel, and
>> courier-authlib-userdb. I did this as user "root".
>> In step 3, I did an "rpmbuild -ta COURIER-TARBALL". I did this as user
>> "courier".
>> What did I do wrong?
>
> These files should go into the -fax subpackage. These files were
> installed but for some reason the specfile did not package them.
>
> Although it might be worthwhile to investigate the real problem, you
> probably don't care for the optional fax subpackage, so it'll be faster
> to just to ignore it.
>
> Move the tarball into rpm/SOURCES. Extract courier.spec from the
> tarball and move it into rpm/SPECS. Edit the courier.spec file in the
> SOURCES directory, replace
>
> %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 1
>
> with
>
> %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0
>
> Then run 'rpmbuild -ba courier.spec'.

Got it.

I think I figured out the real problem, also:

I actually didn't do an "rpmbuild -ta TARBALL", but rather, an "rpmbuild
-ba SPECFILE" (I forgot that I had done this when I wrote my previous
message). In that file, I had set the '_without_fax' macro to '1'
because I didn't want the fax stuff.

That caused the real problem. Now I have a workaround for it with
_unpackaged_files_terminate_build set to 0, as you have suggested.

Thanks!


--
Lloyd Zusman
ljz@asfast.com
God bless you.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users