Re: [courier-users] scanning for spam on relay server

On 4/27/05, Ben Kennedy <ben@zygoat.ca> wrote:
=20
> I've only added the latter logic in the last week or so (following
> consultation on this list). I should point out that in the last couple
> of days, I've found two situations where courier is answering on SMTP but
> no dialog happens; my cpu load is way up and there are two dozen
> invocations of perlfilter running. This was not happening before so I
> suspect there might be some new fault I've introduced, but I'm not sure.

Thanks Ben. It works but as you mentioned, my CPU utilisation is
always not less than 80%.
I do not require to check for authenticated sessions as I don't do any
authenticated smtp so could you kindly send me the earlier version of
your filter that does not have this?

cheers
Hari



=20
> -ben


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users