[courier-users] Question about storage architecture? Hardlinks for multiple deliveries?

This is a discussion on [courier-users] Question about storage architecture? Hardlinks for multiple deliveries? within the Courier-Imap forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_079B_01C52175.9384EEA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Mail Servers and Related > Courier-Imap

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2005
Mitch
 
Posts: n/a
Default [courier-users] Question about storage architecture? Hardlinks for multiple deliveries?

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_079B_01C52175.9384EEA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I did some googling - I thought this idea had come up before can't see it
though - we were reviewing the number of messages on our system with
multiple recipients and came up with more than a few - my understanding is
that Gmail uses a hardlink-like system to basically reference count messages
received - saves on storage demands and makes their marketing needs easier.



Could something similar be accomplished with courier (not the marketing -
just the storage savings!)



I'm not expecting an instant change - now or ever - just throwing out the
idea to consider the relative merits and difficulties.



In our case we have condense our maildrop processing into maildroprc - users
don't run custom scripts - conceivably a single message could be delivered
to ALL recipients instead of a copy for each. This would reduce processing
and storage demands drastically - I see a lot of difficulties to be overcome
just curious what people think.



Thanks!



m/


------=_NextPart_000_079B_01C52175.9384EEA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:Arial;
color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

</head>

<body lang=3DEN-CA link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple>

<div class=3DSection1>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>I did some googling – I thought this =
idea had
come up before can’t see it though&nbsp; – we were reviewing =
the
number of messages on our system with multiple recipients and came up =
with more
than a few – my understanding is that Gmail uses a hardlink-like =
system
to basically reference count messages received – saves on storage =
demands
and makes their marketing needs =
easier…<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Could something similar be accomplished with =
courier
(not the marketing – just the storage =
savings!)<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>I’m not expecting an instant change =
– now
or ever – just throwing out the idea to consider the relative =
merits and
difficulties…<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>In our case we have condense our maildrop =
processing
into maildroprc – users don’t run custom scripts –
conceivably a single message could be delivered to ALL recipients =
instead of a
copy for each. This would reduce processing and storage demands =
drastically –
I see a lot of difficulties to be overcome just curious what people =
think.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Thanks!<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>m/<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

</div>

</body>

</html>

------=_NextPart_000_079B_01C52175.9384EEA0--



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0