This is a discussion on [courier-users] Question about storage architecture? Hardlinks for multiple deliveries? within the Courier-Imap forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_079B_01C52175.9384EEA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_079B_01C52175.9384EEA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I did some googling - I thought this idea had come up before can't see it though - we were reviewing the number of messages on our system with multiple recipients and came up with more than a few - my understanding is that Gmail uses a hardlink-like system to basically reference count messages received - saves on storage demands and makes their marketing needs easier. Could something similar be accomplished with courier (not the marketing - just the storage savings!) I'm not expecting an instant change - now or ever - just throwing out the idea to consider the relative merits and difficulties. In our case we have condense our maildrop processing into maildroprc - users don't run custom scripts - conceivably a single message could be delivered to ALL recipients instead of a copy for each. This would reduce processing and storage demands drastically - I see a lot of difficulties to be overcome just curious what people think. Thanks! m/ ------=_NextPart_000_079B_01C52175.9384EEA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"> <meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)"> <style> <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal-compose; font-family:Arial; color:windowtext;} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style> </head> <body lang=3DEN-CA link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple> <div class=3DSection1> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US = style=3D'font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>I did some googling – I thought this = idea had come up before can’t see it though – we were reviewing = the number of messages on our system with multiple recipients and came up = with more than a few – my understanding is that Gmail uses a hardlink-like = system to basically reference count messages received – saves on storage = demands and makes their marketing needs = easier…<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US = style=3D'font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US = style=3D'font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Could something similar be accomplished with = courier (not the marketing – just the storage = savings!)<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US = style=3D'font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US = style=3D'font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>I’m not expecting an instant change = – now or ever – just throwing out the idea to consider the relative = merits and difficulties…<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US = style=3D'font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US = style=3D'font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>In our case we have condense our maildrop = processing into maildroprc – users don’t run custom scripts – conceivably a single message could be delivered to ALL recipients = instead of a copy for each. This would reduce processing and storage demands = drastically – I see a lot of difficulties to be overcome just curious what people = think.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US = style=3D'font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US = style=3D'font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Thanks!<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US = style=3D'font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span lang=3DEN-US = style=3D'font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>m/<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> </div> </body> </html> ------=_NextPart_000_079B_01C52175.9384EEA0-- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/.../courier-users |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|