This is a discussion on Re: dns for DMZ with many servers (views confusion) within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; In article <d84kq5$1rup$1@sf1.isc.org>, Micha½ Kurowski <mkur@poczta.gazeta.pl> wrote: > ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
In article <d84kq5$1rup$1@sf1.isc.org>,
Micha½ Kurowski <mkur@poczta.gazeta.pl> wrote: > Hi, > > I think I'm confused a bit and I'd like to ask for some explanation. > > How actually views are supposed to work in DMZ-type network with > multiple servers ? > > There are many different services in our DMZ running on many servers. > Each one of them is supposed to be seen as the same (top-level) > "address". External view (or external bind) has no problems and the > traffic is nicely forwarded by the firewall (DNAT-ed). > > My problem is the internal server (view). SMTP, WWW, FTP servers > should all be resolved to the same top-level name and I'm not really > sure how to do this. In the external view, all the names will resolve to the firewall's public address (let's say it's 192.168.10.20): www IN A 192.168.10.20 smtp IN A 192.168.10.20 ftp IN A 192.168.10.20 But in the internal view, the names will resolve to the specific addresses (let's say they're in the 172.16.30.0/24 subnet): www IN A 172.16.30.5 smtp IN A 172.16.30.6 ftp IN A 172.16.30.7 Are you trying to use a single name for all the services? That won't work if they're on different servers and there's no port-forwarding device in the path. So don't do that. -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me *** |