This is a discussion on iterative query timeouts & recursive-clients within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Hi, Just wondering; when a caching server (Bind9) sends out queries, as part of the iterative resolving process, how long ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hi, Just wondering; when a caching server (Bind9) sends out queries, as part of the iterative resolving process, how long does it take for the query to time-out? Can this be tuned or is it hardcoded? Is it specified (in e.g. some RFC) how 'patient' a server sould be in this case? Or based on ?? Also I'm wondering what 'recursive-clients' clients option does exactly. If two clients request the same name (& record type) at (roughly) the same time and the answer is not in the cache. Does this count as one, or as two towards the recursive-clients limit? It only needs to do all the queries *once* in order to answer *both* clients, but I'm uncertain how to interpret "The maximum number of simultaneous recursive lookups the server will perform on behalf of clients." in this case. Coupled with the first question; How quickly can the number of 'recursive-clients' be exhausted when some (or all) name-servers needed to resolve some freq. requsted name are unreachable? Background. Just some questions that where raised when thinking about the "no more recursive clients" log messages. recursive-clients is currently set at 10000 and still (sometimes) beeing hit... And I'm thinking about which things I may need to take into account when guestimating what are reasonable values for that option. Rgds, Mark. |