Re: How to find ver in BIND 8.x for NT?

This is a discussion on Re: How to find ver in BIND 8.x for NT? within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; At 7:48 PM -0400 2005-05-17, Danny Mayer wrote: > Because of a number of architectural issues that ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2005
Brad Knowles
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: How to find ver in BIND 8.x for NT?

At 7:48 PM -0400 2005-05-17, Danny Mayer wrote:

> Because of a number of architectural issues that were finally fixed
> in BIND 9.3.0 and 9.2.4 I don't recommend any version of BIND
> earlier than those and none of the BIND 8 versions.


Good advice.

> BIND 9 does
> support round robin but I have no idea what you mean by round robin
> through multiple CNAME's nor why you need to use multiple CNAME's.


I'm not sure, but he may be talking about the same CNAME trick we
were using at AOL to do very crude round-robin load-balancing for
americaonline.aol.com (the hostname that the AOL client connects to,
if you bring your own access).

What it amounts to is a CNAME chain, with multiple CNAME records
at certain levels. So, americaonline.aol.com might have multiple
aliases pointing to dial.internet.aol.com, dial1.internet.aol.com,
.... dialXXXX.internet.aol.com. Likewise, each of the
dialXXXX.internet.aol.com names would have multiple CNAME records
pointing to 1.internet.aol.com, 2.internet.aol.com, ...
YYY.internet.aol.com, and the actual A records are only associated
with the final CNAME target.

The cool thing is that, when you do anything other than a CNAME
query for a given hostname, only one path down the CNAME chain will
be followed. Just two numeric digits in the CNAME aliases for two
levels could give you ten thousand different final sets of target IP
addresses, and each final set would be relatively limited in size.

Anyway, we couldn't use it for mail, because you can't point MX
records at CNAMEs, but it worked a treat for americaonline.aol.com.


However, I believe that this is an old trick that works under
BIND-8 and not under BIND-9. IIRC, this wasn't technically illegal
according to the original spec and BIND-8 allowed it, but apparently
BIND-9 tightened up on this issue (perhaps in response to some newer
guidance?).

If you check the authoritative nameservers for AOL, you will find
that dns-01.ns.aol.com through dns-09.ns.aol.com appear to be running
BIND 9.2.3rc1-9.4.0a0 (according to fpdns.pl), while internet.aol.com
is delegated to two other nameservers (aol-23a.aol.com and
aol-23b.aol.com), both of which appear to be running BIND
8.3.0rc1-8.4.4 (according to fpdns.pl).

Interestingly, these latter two machines also appear to have
recursion enabled. I'll have to have a talk with the hostmaster
folks.

--
Brad Knowles, <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755

SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.


Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0