This is a discussion on Re: Bind 9 strict zones within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; bind-users-bounce@isc.org wrote on 05/04/2005 02:09:51 PM: > Hello, we are upgrading our ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
bind-users-bounce@isc.org wrote on 05/04/2005 02:09:51 PM:
> Hello, we are upgrading our DNS server from BIND 8 to 9 but we have > noticed that we have some issues with our zone configuration. We see > that if we had a zone called db.bar with entries for bar.net and > foo.bar.net everything is fine but if we had a 4th level record in the > same zone this is no longer valid in BIND9 and we would need a > seperate zone. I know this is the correct way to do this but is there > a work so we could have bar.net and foo.bar.net AND test.foo.bar.net > in the bar.net zone? > So is there a way to do the following within the same zone in BIND 9? > localhost IN A 127.0.0.1 > @ IN A 192.168.1.1 > www IN A 192.168.1.1 > foo IN A 192.168.1.2 > test.foo.bar IN A 192.168.1.3 If this is the zone database file for bar.net then perhaps the last RR should be: test.foo IN A 192.168.1.3 Also, the first RR for localhost is probably not required. By the way, what is the exact error you are getting that indicates named is not loading the zone? Also, you may want to post your actual zone db file. thanks, dave... > > Thanks, > Nick > > |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|