This is a discussion on Re: Do I need MX record at all? within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 unix@edify.com wrote: > > Hi > I have read the DNS and BIND ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 unix@edify.com wrote: > > Hi > I have read the DNS and BIND book and do understand the importance > of a MX record. This weekend, I am making changes to the MX records with > names and priority numbers. > > I would like to know if MX record is needed at all reason is I am > using Sendmail (8.12.11)on the same DNS server that uses mailertable which > has entries to tell where it needs to pass on email. I have Checkpoint FW > rules to tell how the email should be routed, so do I really need MX record > for the outside world to tell where email should be delivered to. Below is > my architecture. > > Inbound email --> Checkpoint Firewall --> SMTP relay (in DMZ) running BIND > and Sendmail --> Exchange (internal). > > I will appreciate if someone clarifies this for me. TIA. You need an MX record so that clients on the internet know where to send e-mail (not strictly true as in the absense of an MX thye will try to deliver mail to the A record, but trust me its better to have one) -- Brett Carr Ripe Network Coordination Centre System Engineer -- Operations Group Singel 258 Amsterdam NL > > Ragu > > |