This is a discussion on Re: IPv6 and named.conf within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; > Hello, > > Since we still can't use acls for masters {}, and we can't use a hostname &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
> Hello, > > Since we still can't use acls for masters {}, and we can't use a hostname > in masters {}, and we can't put an IPv6 address in there, how are we > supposed to tell our slaves to allow updates from an IPv6 address? Your question doesn't make sense. If you want to transfer from a IPv6 address you put a IPv6 address in the masters clauses. This works for BIND 8.4.x and BIND 9.x.x. If you want to allow UPDATE requests from a IPv6 address then use allow-update-forwarding so they will be sent to the master. allow-update-forwarding supports IPv6 addresses. This works for BIND 9.x.x. BIND 8 slaves don't implement update forwarding. > Also, when will masters {} be fixed to allow acls? Or will sed be a > permanent requirement for BIND? BIND 9.3 supports named masters clauses. Acls say allow this *address range* or key to perform some function. A plain address is shorthand for IPv4/32 or IPv6/128. Masters clauses say connect to this *address* optionally with this key. They are conceptually very different things. > Thanks, > John Klos -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|