This is a discussion on Re: easy to understand definitions within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; In article <d1s41h$1985$1@sf1.isc.org>, Bob Lockie <bjlockie@lockie.ca> wrote: > I ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
In article <d1s41h$1985$1@sf1.isc.org>, Bob Lockie <bjlockie@lockie.ca>
wrote: > I don't understand "expire" and "refresh", it would seem that "expire" > should always be equal to the "refresh" time"? That would effectively negate the value of having slave servers. The point of multiple servers is fault-tolerance. You want the slaves to continue serving the zone when the master has failed, don't you? If you set Expire == Refresh, then when the slave checks whether a zone transfer is needed, and doesn't get an answer from the master, it will stop answering for the zone, and you'll have *no* servers responding. -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me *** |