This is a discussion on Re: Bind 9 is slow? Please help within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; > HI Mark, > Thanks for your reply. I am sorry, unfortunately I didn't get you. Will > appreciate ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
> HI Mark, > Thanks for your reply. I am sorry, unfortunately I didn't get you. Will > appreciate you if can just let me know that > > 1- Is it ok to run "named -4" in production environment Yes. > 2- Will --disbale-ipv6 at compilation time should be enough to stop > IPv6? Yes (--disable-ipv6). Either will do. > Thanks, > MJ > > -----Original Message----- > From: bind-users-bounce@isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce@isc.org] On > Behalf Of Mark Andrews > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:25 AM > Cc: comp-protocols-dns-bind@isc.org > Subject: Re: Bind 9 is slow? Please help > > > > It was far from an exhaustive search, I only spent about five minutes > > on it if that, less time than it took me to write this post, but the > > BIND 9.3.1 configure script appears to default to autodetect for IPv6 > > support, and bases IPv6 support on the presence of a sockaddr_in6 > > structure. > > > > So, if a platform is _capable_ of IPv6 it would seem that BIND 9.3.1 > > will include IPv6 support in the compile. > > > > I've _not_ looked to see what the code does at runtime. > > > > rick jones > > -- > > The glass is neither half-empty nor half-full. The glass has a leak. > > The real question is "Can it be patched?" > > these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :) > > feel free to post, OR email to raj in cup.hp.com but NOT BOTH... > > 'named -4' is a runtime equivalent to 'configure > --disable-ipv6'. > > To the OP, I would be checking that you are running the > instance of named that you think you are. Check you logs > or query the server (dig +norec version.bind txt chaos @server). > > BIND 9.3.1 and 9.2.5 both have code to fast retry on the > usual error codes returned when you don't have IPv6 configured. > They also do penalise the RTT estimates (they wern't being > penalised in 9.3.0 and 9.2.4). Either of these is sufficient > to remove the delay though the second will still show some > delay until the rtt estimate has been adjusted. > > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org > > > > > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org |