Re: Bind 9 is slow? Please help

This is a discussion on Re: Bind 9 is slow? Please help within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; > HI Mark, > Thanks for your reply. I am sorry, unfortunately I didn't get you. Will > appreciate ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2005
Mark Andrews
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bind 9 is slow? Please help


> HI Mark,
> Thanks for your reply. I am sorry, unfortunately I didn't get you. Will
> appreciate you if can just let me know that
>
> 1- Is it ok to run "named -4" in production environment


Yes.

> 2- Will --disbale-ipv6 at compilation time should be enough to stop
> IPv6?


Yes (--disable-ipv6).

Either will do.

> Thanks,
> MJ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bind-users-bounce@isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce@isc.org] On
> Behalf Of Mark Andrews
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:25 AM
> Cc: comp-protocols-dns-bind@isc.org
> Subject: Re: Bind 9 is slow? Please help
>
>
> > It was far from an exhaustive search, I only spent about five minutes
> > on it if that, less time than it took me to write this post, but the
> > BIND 9.3.1 configure script appears to default to autodetect for IPv6
> > support, and bases IPv6 support on the presence of a sockaddr_in6
> > structure.
> >
> > So, if a platform is _capable_ of IPv6 it would seem that BIND 9.3.1
> > will include IPv6 support in the compile.
> >
> > I've _not_ looked to see what the code does at runtime.
> >
> > rick jones
> > --
> > The glass is neither half-empty nor half-full. The glass has a leak.
> > The real question is "Can it be patched?"
> > these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
> > feel free to post, OR email to raj in cup.hp.com but NOT BOTH...

>
> 'named -4' is a runtime equivalent to 'configure
> --disable-ipv6'.
>
> To the OP, I would be checking that you are running the
> instance of named that you think you are. Check you logs
> or query the server (dig +norec version.bind txt chaos @server).
>
> BIND 9.3.1 and 9.2.5 both have code to fast retry on the
> usual error codes returned when you don't have IPv6 configured.
> They also do penalise the RTT estimates (they wern't being
> penalised in 9.3.0 and 9.2.4). Either of these is sufficient
> to remove the delay though the second will still show some
> delay until the rtt estimate has been adjusted.
>
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
>
>
>
>
>

--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org


Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0