This is a discussion on Re: NS records for subzone cause BIND 9 failures within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Kurt Boyack wrote: >When a parent zone has subzone data in it, NS records for the subzone >will ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Kurt Boyack wrote:
>When a parent zone has subzone data in it, NS records for the subzone >will cause BIND 9 servers to fail to resolve any of the subzone's >data. The problem does not exist with 8.2.3, but does with 9.2.1 and >9.3.0. > Well, it's not a "problem"; it's the way DNS is supposed to work. When you delegate a zone to other nameservers, then those nameservers own the data in the zone, not you. The only exceptions are so-called "glue" records describing the nameservers for the child zone. Ordinary records, like A records which are not associated with nameservers, MX records and so forth, belong to the "closest enclosing zone", i.e. the child (or "child-most") zone. - Kevin |