This is a discussion on Re: BIND and AD integration within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; John Welch <jrw3319@nospamcomcast.net> wrote: >In the near future my company will be migrating from a ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
John Welch <jrw3319@nospamcomcast.net> wrote:
>In the near future my company will be migrating from a Windows NT >domain to a Windows 2003 Active Directory infrastructure. We are >currently using BIND version 9.2 running on Linux servers for our >internal DNS needs. We are also using ISC's DHCP server, which is >configured to do Dynamic DNS updates for the clients. My goal is to >continue to use BIND and our current DHCP server setup and not have to >get involved with setting up these services on the MS side of things. >My knowledge of AD is limited at this point, but I will be getting >some training soon, and we will also have some outside help with the >migration process. However, I have a feeling that both the training >and the outside help will be slanted toward Microsoft. I want to be >prepared to make the necessary adjustments to our BIND configuration, >so that we don't get forced into using the Microsoft services. > >I've been searching around for some information on this topic and have >found some relevant things. I came across the "BIND + AD HOWTO" and >I also found a Linux Magazine article written by Cricket Liu >describing this setup. Both describe the setup of four sub-domains >with the the BIND configuration (_msdcs, _sites, _tcp, and _upd). > >The one thing that has me concerned is the fact that both of these >documents were written in 2001. I'm wondering if this type of setup >still applies, especially under Windows 2003, as opposed to Windows >2000, which is referenced in both documents. I'm looking for any >additional reference material that may be available for BIND >integration with AD. I'd also be interesting in hearing from anyone >that has this type of setup (any "gotchas", or major configuration >changes to be aware of?). Check the archives of this list and its sister list bind9-users@isc.org (combined with bind-users in June, 2004) as there are many AD-related postings in the past years. As for W2k+3, there are two new AD zones that you need to create ForestDNSZones.example.com DomainDNSZones.example.com These zones contain SRV records, which are registered by DCs, I assume dynamically by the netlgon process. I have no experience with ISC's DHCP with DDNS in an AD enviromnent; I do have one forward zone and five reverse zones managed dynamically by a MS W2k DHCP Server. I would check the archives of dhcp-server@isc.org to see if there are any postings regarding AD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Barry S. Finkel Computing and Information Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory Phone: +1 (630) 252-7277 9700 South Cass Avenue Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-4601 Building 222, Room D209 Internet: BSFinkel@anl.gov Argonne, IL 60439-4828 IBMMAIL: I1004994 |