Re: shutting down due to TCP receive error

This is a discussion on Re: shutting down due to TCP receive error within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Clade <cdelia@melitacable.com> wrote: > I work at an ISP. We have two name servers, a primary ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2005
Rick Jones
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: shutting down due to TCP receive error

Clade <cdelia@melitacable.com> wrote:
> I work at an ISP. We have two name servers, a primary and a
> secondary name server. We also have a caching server. The primary
> name server and the caching server sun operate with Solaris 9 and
> they run BIND 9.2.3 . The secondary name server runs Bind 9.2.2 and
> Solaris 8. Lately, I have been noting error messages like


> named[135]: [ID 873579 daemon.error] dispatch 41d110: shutting down
> due to TCP receive error: connection reset


> on all the three servers. Can someone please help? Although the
> connection is said to be reset, the name service does not appear to
> be effected in any way. On the 2 servers running BIND 9.2.3, BIND is
> running in chroot mode where a directory /var/named has been created
> and all BIND files and services are operating from with this
> directory.


Do you run TCP between the three servers? If so, Solaris may still
have text in the RST segment that explains the reason for the reset -
a tcpdump trace and a bit of hex decode would be in order, something
that should not be too difficult for an ISP :)

Otherwise, there can be many reasons for a RST - the remote may have
given-up on trying to transmit data to your system(s). It could be a
Windows or other application that is (ab)using the SO_LINGER option to
use abortive closes. It could be that your system sent data to the
remote after the remote had called close().

rick jones
--
The glass is neither half-empty nor half-full. The glass has a leak.
The real question is "Can it be patched?"
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to raj in cup.hp.com but NOT BOTH...


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0