Re: nameservers and glue...

Am So, den 20.02.2005 schrieb Barry Margolin um 7:28:
> In article <cv51c2$2jh3$1@sf1.isc.org>,
> Marco Schumann <schumann@strato-rz.de> wrote:
> > $ dnsq any ns11.ns-one.net k.gtld-servers.net.
> > 255 ns11.ns-one.net:
> > 101 bytes, 1+0+2+2 records, response, noerror
> > query: 255 ns11.ns-one.net
> > authority: ns-one.net 172800 NS ns1.ns-one.net
> > authority: ns-one.net 172800 NS ns2.ns-one.net
> > additional: ns1.ns-one.net 172800 A 65.254.63.216
> > additional: ns2.ns-one.net 172800 A 65.58.240.229
> >
> > $ dnsq any ns12.ns-one.net e.gtld-servers.net.
> > 255 ns12.ns-one.net:
> > 101 bytes, 1+0+2+2 records, response, noerror
> > query: 255 ns12.ns-one.net
> > authority: ns-one.net 172800 NS ns1.ns-one.net
> > authority: ns-one.net 172800 NS ns2.ns-one.net
> > additional: ns1.ns-one.net 172800 A 65.254.63.216
> > additional: ns2.ns-one.net 172800 A 65.58.240.229
> >
> > Why do you think the entries are missing?
>
> Why do you think they're there? Your output shows referral records,
> which don't contain the entries for ns11 or ns12. The referrals include
> the glue records for ns1 and ns2.
Barry,

you're absolutely right and I must have been blind... Neither there is
an answer section nor do the answers fit the query. I need to apologize.

--
_____________________________
[Marco Schumann
[Strato Rechenzentrum AG
_____________________________
[Pascalstraße 10
[10587 Berlin
_____________________________

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: signature.asc
-- Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCGZtfR0DtirAgDlgRAtLXAKC6XdsuIbRzS4AlRmauoj 8cawShqACfcNWB
vxaNv2cuqegqpJeF2FwcjtY=
=4yF/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----