RE: Tuning Bind9?

This is a discussion on RE: Tuning Bind9? within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; >>=20 >> However, then we do _big_ zone-transfers of a hole zone (for example = =3D >&...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2005
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Tuning Bind9?

>>=20
>> However, then we do _big_ zone-transfers of a hole zone (for example =

=3D
>> RBL-zones), the name-resulotion (queries) becomes really slow, and =

those =3D
>> zone-transfers can take a long time if you need to transfer the hole =

=3D
>> zone.
>> Has someone else had this problem? and solved it?

>
>I had similar problems. I solved them using rbldnsd as the backend for =


>DNSBL zones, with named in front of it.
>


Could you be more specific? Are you running both named and rbldnsd, on =
the same server? (then you would need virtual IPs atleast?)=20
And with named infront of it?... By doing forwarding to the "rbl-zone" =
in named.conf?

Thx,


Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0