Re: DDNS and Hidden Master == Brain-Damaged

This is a discussion on Re: DDNS and Hidden Master == Brain-Damaged within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; > > then make it non-trash by some insane definition. for example, make it > > match one of ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2005
Paul Vixie
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: DDNS and Hidden Master == Brain-Damaged

> > then make it non-trash by some insane definition. for example, make it
> > match one of the NS.NSDNAME's, according to the "dns view" seen by your
> > dhcp population. if you want your master hidden, then make sure that
> > the non-dhcp-population sees some other SOA and NS for that zone. no
> > problem.

>
> I would have to agree that a hidden master that is seen by all your dhcp
> clients is an insane definition of hidden.


i've never seen someone hide their master internally (where dhcp runs),
only externally (to keep it from getting hacked or ddos'd). yymv.

> I think a far better solution for me is to lobotomize that section of
> code in dhcpd.


would it make sense to add syntax to dhcpd.conf allowing you to select
the address to which updates will be sent, thus bypassing res_findzonecut()?
(this is the logical equivilent of specifying the server when running the
nsupdate shell-level command.)
--
Paul Vixie


Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0