This is a discussion on Re: administering 1,000 zone files within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 03:21:33PM +0100, Mariano Cunietti wrote: > > Also look into using a &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 03:21:33PM +0100, Mariano Cunietti wrote:
> > Also look into using a "hidden" master , it will simplify things > > whenever you encounter an error during reload of your master. > > Thanks Peter. > I was considering to use the "include" statement in my slave named.conf, > to ease the readability of my newly generated slave zone list, and to > keep it apart from general configuration statement as well. > May this be a *correct* way to proceed? This was my way to do it: A hidden master with about 200000 zones and a handfull of slaves. The named.conf on the slaves is split into a general section and many include files. Each include file held the zone statements for a sorted subset of zones with a specific prefix (i.e. all zones starting with 'aaa' to 'aez' or similar). The split is necessary because the whole config is several ten megabytes that you do not want to read and write for every change. Adding or deleting zones on the master triggered ssh sessions to each slave that ran a small program to add/delete zone statements to/from the appropriate include files and set a flag. The flag was polled regularly to reload the nameserver. The polling time is offset individually for each slave to avoid reloading (which means an interruption of service) for a whole nameserver set. Greetings, -- Michael van Elst Internet: mlelstv@serpens.de "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree." |