This is a discussion on Re: to +norec or not to +norec within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; In article <cqv3tc$3ds$1@sf1.isc.org>, "kirkgbr@yahoo(dot)com" <kirkgbr@yahoo.com&...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
In article <cqv3tc$3ds$1@sf1.isc.org>,
"kirkgbr@yahoo(dot)com" <kirkgbr@yahoo.com> wrote: > I have read the "dig" man page and searched(possibly incorrectly) the > archives. But I cannot find an answer to my silly question. What is > the purpose of using the "+norec" on dig queries? I have tried a few > queries with and without +norec and seem to get the same results on > both. I am using version 9.2.3 dig. > thanks in advance for those who would share their knowledge. Use the +norec option when you want to emulate the type of query that comes from a recursing server, as opposed to a query from a stub resolver. -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me *** |