Re: to +norec or not to +norec

This is a discussion on Re: to +norec or not to +norec within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; In article <cqv3tc$3ds$1@sf1.isc.org>, "kirkgbr@yahoo(dot)com" <kirkgbr@yahoo.com&...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2004
Barry Margolin
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: to +norec or not to +norec

In article <cqv3tc$3ds$1@sf1.isc.org>,
"kirkgbr@yahoo(dot)com" <kirkgbr@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I have read the "dig" man page and searched(possibly incorrectly) the
> archives. But I cannot find an answer to my silly question. What is
> the purpose of using the "+norec" on dig queries? I have tried a few
> queries with and without +norec and seem to get the same results on
> both. I am using version 9.2.3 dig.
> thanks in advance for those who would share their knowledge.


Use the +norec option when you want to emulate the type of query that
comes from a recursing server, as opposed to a query from a stub
resolver.

--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***


Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0