This is a discussion on Re: Bind 8 hardening {Scanned} within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 SW wrote: | Hi folks, | | I'm in the process of setting up 2 dns ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 SW wrote: | Hi folks, | | I'm in the process of setting up 2 dns servers and after reading various | docs, I'm hoping someone can take a look at my /etc/named.conf's below and | tell me if I have everything I need to keep my servers safe from the various | bind exploits. The goal is to allow internal clients access and allow the | world to be able to resolve local domains (ie our website, mail, etc). | Anything else I want to block without breaking bind. | | Master 100.168.100.10 /etc/named.conf : | | acl internal { 192.168.100/24; 100.168.100/24; }; | acl slaves { 100.168.100.50; }; | | Also, whenever I do a nslookup mydomain.com from a local client, I get the | following error: | # nslookup yahoo.com | *** Can't find server name for address 100.168.100.10: Non-existent | host/domaine | *** Can't find server name for address 100.168.100.50: Query refused | *** Default servers are not available | | Thanks, | | SW I'm probably not getting the question right, and I'm probably trying answer the wrong issue, but what subnet is the "local" client on? If the local client is in the 192.168.100/24 range, what route gets the client to the 100.168.100/24 subnet? Also 100.168.100.50 falls into that iana blackhole, seems an odd choice. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB0s0Da44x14FCa6ARAqglAKCUns+l3Z/FZ44Rp8DPlrSxmF6n3wCgqFo9 lh+9pRvmnNe+Om2be144ITA= =z1kk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|