RE: Need clue: Underscore zones and hostnames

This is a discussion on RE: Need clue: Underscore zones and hostnames within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; I'm just skimming the thread but this may help zone "_tcp.firecorporate.com" IN { type master; file &...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2004
zeek
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Need clue: Underscore zones and hostnames



I'm just skimming the thread but this may help

zone "_tcp.firecorporate.com" IN {
type master;
file "_tcp.firecorporate.com";
check-names ignore;
allow-update {ADservers;};
};



I got this from the AD+BIND howto.

However, I am also getting this in my log:

Dec 6 10:04:32 elvis named[23566]: /etc/named.conf:92: option 'check-names'
is not implemented


Cheers,
-zeek

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bind-users-bounce@isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounce@isc.org] On Behalf Of Gregory Hicks
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 1:23 PM
> To: bind-users@isc.org; bind-users@dollardns.net; nhruby@uga.edu
> Subject: Re: Need clue: Underscore zones and hostnames
>
>
> > From: "SilentRage" <bind-users@dollardns.net>
> > To: "\"nathan r. hruby\"" <bind-users@isc.org>
> > Subject: Re: Need clue: Underscore zones and hostnames
> > Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:07:18 -0500
> >
> > It seems you're already informed on the issue. Supposedly

> yeah, there
> > are some resolvers that might choke on hostnames with

> characters that
> > don't follow the standards for internet host names. Most

> especially
> > you shouldn't create mail domains or mail server domains

> with invalid
> > characters, cause that's a whole new suite of applications

> that might choke.
> >
> > The dns protocol places no restriction on 'name' content,

> which is why
> > BIND supports it, and why it works just fine in practice. For my
> > service I allow clients to create hostnames with whatever

> characters
> > they want. If they want binary characters, go for it.

> Limiting what
> > they create limits creativity and proprietary usage. If

> they manage
> > to shoot themself in the foot, I'll hand them the gun, bullets, and
> > all. If they come to me asking why some of their clients

> can't visit
> > their underscore site, I'll educate them. :)

>
> Given that I, and my cohorts, administer a 30,000 host domain
> (fairly small by some standards but large enough), if I can
> educate my users when they ask to have names created, then
> that reduces support costs for me. This is a Good Thing.
>
> Yes, limiting what they "create" limits creativity and
> proprietary usage. But it also reduces my potential support
> costs. Which is a Good Thing.
>
> Besides, if asked, the reason they want the underscore is
> because that allows the names to show up as separate "words"
> in a web link. A 'dash' does not do this "neat" formatting.
>
> Regards,
> Gregory hicks
>
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "nathan r. hruby" <nhruby@uga.edu>
> > To: <bind-users@isc.org>
> > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:36 PM
> > Subject: Need clue: Underscore zones and hostnames
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can someone please thwack me with the requisite clue-by-four and
> > > point me at the RFC that Yea's or Nea's the use of the underscore
> > > character in host and/or zone names? Google seems to not

> be helpful
> > > in finding a definitive answer. Perhaps there is none?
> > >
> > > Here's why I ask:
> > > We current support Microsoft's Active Directory on our BIND
> > > nameservers, with check-names disabled on the BIND8

> machines, so we
> > > *have* zones with underscore characters already working.
> > >
> > > Recently for some odd reason people have been requesting

> hostnames
> > > like martha_stewart.jailhouse.uga.edu. This "works" in

> as much as
> > > BIND doesn't reject the name and does serve it (thanks to some
> > > legacy names :). We also know that it's not recommended

> per various
> > > RFC's so we've been rejecting these updates and manually

> going back
> > > to the user to get them to fix it.
> > >
> > > But since it works and we have zones that *depend* on

> this behavior,
> > > we're
> > > wondering:
> > > - Are we just missing an updated RFC that now allows this?
> > > - Is an underscore allowed just for zones and still not

> for a host?
> > > - Is this just an Microsoft-ism?
> > > - Do we (or perhpas: should we) care enough to not let users shoot
> > > themselves in their feet?
> > >
> > > Note: I didn't setup the original AD-in-BIND

> infrastructure, and the
> > > person who did is not here anymore. The docs we have fail to
> > > mention the underscore issue and we're presently looking

> at various
> > > DNS changes we want to make, including our request interface that
> > > can "fix" these before they get to the update stage,

> hence my desire
> > > to have a clue about it :)
> > >
> > > Thanks for any help anyone can give me.
> > >
> > > -n
> > >
> > > --
> > > -------------------------------------------
> > > nathan hruby <nhruby@uga.edu>
> > > uga enterprise information technology services production systems
> > > support metaphysically wrinkle-free
> > > -------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gregory Hicks | Principal Systems Engineer
> Cadence Design Systems | Direct: 408.576.3609
> 555 River Oaks Pkwy M/S 6B1 | Fax: 408.894.3400
> San Jose, CA 95134 | Internet: ghicks@cadence.com
>
> I am perfectly capable of learning from my mistakes. I will surely
> learn a great deal today.
>
> "A democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding on what to have for
> lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the results of the
> decision." - Benjamin Franklin
>
> "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they
> be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton
>
>
>
>
>



Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0