This is a discussion on RE: Need clue: Underscore zones and hostnames within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; I'm just skimming the thread but this may help zone "_tcp.firecorporate.com" IN { type master; file &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I'm just skimming the thread but this may help zone "_tcp.firecorporate.com" IN { type master; file "_tcp.firecorporate.com"; check-names ignore; allow-update {ADservers;}; }; I got this from the AD+BIND howto. However, I am also getting this in my log: Dec 6 10:04:32 elvis named[23566]: /etc/named.conf:92: option 'check-names' is not implemented Cheers, -zeek > -----Original Message----- > From: bind-users-bounce@isc.org > [mailto:bind-users-bounce@isc.org] On Behalf Of Gregory Hicks > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 1:23 PM > To: bind-users@isc.org; bind-users@dollardns.net; nhruby@uga.edu > Subject: Re: Need clue: Underscore zones and hostnames > > > > From: "SilentRage" <bind-users@dollardns.net> > > To: "\"nathan r. hruby\"" <bind-users@isc.org> > > Subject: Re: Need clue: Underscore zones and hostnames > > Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:07:18 -0500 > > > > It seems you're already informed on the issue. Supposedly > yeah, there > > are some resolvers that might choke on hostnames with > characters that > > don't follow the standards for internet host names. Most > especially > > you shouldn't create mail domains or mail server domains > with invalid > > characters, cause that's a whole new suite of applications > that might choke. > > > > The dns protocol places no restriction on 'name' content, > which is why > > BIND supports it, and why it works just fine in practice. For my > > service I allow clients to create hostnames with whatever > characters > > they want. If they want binary characters, go for it. > Limiting what > > they create limits creativity and proprietary usage. If > they manage > > to shoot themself in the foot, I'll hand them the gun, bullets, and > > all. If they come to me asking why some of their clients > can't visit > > their underscore site, I'll educate them. :) > > Given that I, and my cohorts, administer a 30,000 host domain > (fairly small by some standards but large enough), if I can > educate my users when they ask to have names created, then > that reduces support costs for me. This is a Good Thing. > > Yes, limiting what they "create" limits creativity and > proprietary usage. But it also reduces my potential support > costs. Which is a Good Thing. > > Besides, if asked, the reason they want the underscore is > because that allows the names to show up as separate "words" > in a web link. A 'dash' does not do this "neat" formatting. > > Regards, > Gregory hicks > > > > > Dave > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "nathan r. hruby" <nhruby@uga.edu> > > To: <bind-users@isc.org> > > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:36 PM > > Subject: Need clue: Underscore zones and hostnames > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Can someone please thwack me with the requisite clue-by-four and > > > point me at the RFC that Yea's or Nea's the use of the underscore > > > character in host and/or zone names? Google seems to not > be helpful > > > in finding a definitive answer. Perhaps there is none? > > > > > > Here's why I ask: > > > We current support Microsoft's Active Directory on our BIND > > > nameservers, with check-names disabled on the BIND8 > machines, so we > > > *have* zones with underscore characters already working. > > > > > > Recently for some odd reason people have been requesting > hostnames > > > like martha_stewart.jailhouse.uga.edu. This "works" in > as much as > > > BIND doesn't reject the name and does serve it (thanks to some > > > legacy names :). We also know that it's not recommended > per various > > > RFC's so we've been rejecting these updates and manually > going back > > > to the user to get them to fix it. > > > > > > But since it works and we have zones that *depend* on > this behavior, > > > we're > > > wondering: > > > - Are we just missing an updated RFC that now allows this? > > > - Is an underscore allowed just for zones and still not > for a host? > > > - Is this just an Microsoft-ism? > > > - Do we (or perhpas: should we) care enough to not let users shoot > > > themselves in their feet? > > > > > > Note: I didn't setup the original AD-in-BIND > infrastructure, and the > > > person who did is not here anymore. The docs we have fail to > > > mention the underscore issue and we're presently looking > at various > > > DNS changes we want to make, including our request interface that > > > can "fix" these before they get to the update stage, > hence my desire > > > to have a clue about it :) > > > > > > Thanks for any help anyone can give me. > > > > > > -n > > > > > > -- > > > ------------------------------------------- > > > nathan hruby <nhruby@uga.edu> > > > uga enterprise information technology services production systems > > > support metaphysically wrinkle-free > > > ------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Gregory Hicks | Principal Systems Engineer > Cadence Design Systems | Direct: 408.576.3609 > 555 River Oaks Pkwy M/S 6B1 | Fax: 408.894.3400 > San Jose, CA 95134 | Internet: ghicks@cadence.com > > I am perfectly capable of learning from my mistakes. I will surely > learn a great deal today. > > "A democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding on what to have for > lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the results of the > decision." - Benjamin Franklin > > "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they > be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton > > > > > |