This is a discussion on Re: Version help within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; In article <ckm2i9$1jva$1@sf1.isc.org>, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> wrote: > ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
In article <ckm2i9$1jva$1@sf1.isc.org>,
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> wrote: > I know this is the Bind9 list, but... No it isn't, this is the BIND list. > I have been running the ISC Bind on NT for some years. It is behind a > firewall. > > I am building a LINUX system with the latest Bind 9 (ran up2date yesterday) > to replace it. > > I want to determine the version of Bind on the NT system. I am pretty sure > it is 8.something. That I did upgrade from 4.9 > > I am working on setting up a CIDRed reverse lookup per RFC 2317. It is > working with Bind9 on LINUX. > > Now that I understand how this works, I want to set it up on my NT's Bind > (the LINUX system still needs Samba and Openldap set up before the switch > over). > > I can't get it to work, the reverse zones are coming up with nothing in > the SOA (when I do a dumpdb) and no RRs. That is why I want the version > number so I can effectively trouble shoot this. dig version.bind txt chaos @<server-address> However, the technique for implementing RFC 2317 reverse zones is not really version-dependent. If you post your named.conf and zone files we may be able to tell you what you did wrong. -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me *** |