This is a discussion on Re: Going crazy! -- "Sending Notifies" not working on Redhat Enterprise within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Hello, I've been reading through documentation, and I still can't find a reason why notifies weren't sent ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hello,
I've been reading through documentation, and I still can't find a reason why notifies weren't sent out to ns2.myvemma.com when it was defined as a CNAME. They were only sent out when it had an A record. In both cases, it had a NS record. Bind 8 seemed to have no problem sending notifies to a slave server that was defined by a CNAME record. Does anyone know if this is an official change? Thank you, -Raiden Johnson On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 raiden@wonko.inow.com wrote: > > Possibly having your NS records as CNAMEs (which you should not have) > > is not doing you any favours ... > > > > Could you rewrite this as: > > > > ns1.myvemma.com. IN A 64.71.162.46 > > ns2.myvemma.com. IN A 64.71.162.42 > > > > web01.myvemma.com. IN CNAME ns1.myvemma.com. > > web02.myvemma.com. IN CNAME ns2.myvemma.com. > > > > and see if that helps? Are the NS records for zone > > subnet40.162.71.64.in-addr.arpa also ns1/ns2.myvemma.com? > > > > This did it!!! Ronan, you are my hero! =P > > But seriously, why should this have mattered? Why would this version of > BIND (past versions seemed to have no problem) not send notifies to slave > NS if they are defined by CNAME instead of A records? > > (I shouldn't press my luck here, since it's all working, but I'd still > like to know. =P) > > Thank you! > -Raiden Johnson > > |