This is a discussion on DNSCACHE / High CPU LOAD & Socket error ? within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Hello, I'm using BIND for DNS CACHE. Using debian package, version is: BIND 9.2.1 Sometimes, CPU incread ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hello,
I'm using BIND for DNS CACHE. Using debian package, version is: BIND 9.2.1 Sometimes, CPU incread to 100% and we don't know why... When trying to stop named properly , it didn"t... only a kill worked. Because we have lot of queries (~ 500 queries /s) , we tuned the named conf with this options: recursive-clients 10000; tcp-clients 5000; (otherwise, there are "maximum reached" messages). Other named options are standards: coresize default; datasize default; files default; stacksize default; recursion yes; fetch-glue yes; fake-iquery no; notify no; auth-nxdomain yes; multiple-cnames yes; allow-transfer { none; }; cleaning-interval 30; heartbeat-interval 0; interface-interval 0; lame-ttl 600; max-ncache-ttl 1080; Here the log during the high CPU Load: Sep 16 14:44:23 nscache0 named[24351]: socket.c:1100: unexpected error: Sep 16 14:44:23 nscache0 named[24351]: internal_send: 62.23.125.234#0: Invalid argument Sep 16 14:44:23 nscache0 named[24351]: client 62.23.125.234#0: error sending response: invalid file Sep 16 14:44:23 nscache0 named[24351]: socket.c:1100: unexpected error: Sep 16 14:44:23 nscache0 named[24351]: internal_send: 62.23.125.234#0: Invalid argument Sep 16 14:44:23 nscache0 named[24351]: client 62.23.125.234#0: error sending response: invalid file [...] This message appears 2000 times in log... what does this message mean ? I saw the same error on Google: http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog.../msg00523.html but don"t give any solution. The CPU of the box is a PIII 1Ghz with 2Go RAM. Thanks in advance. Regards, Nicolas |